In an engaging discussion among The Globe and Mail’s editorial team, the third edition of Canada’s Most Livable Cities ranking has sparked significant interest and inquiry. Released on February 6, the new rankings shed light on how various communities perform in categories like safety, housing, and overall quality of life, while also introducing a fascinating new feature that separates rankings based on population size.
Ottawa Leads Among Major Cities
This latest edition of the rankings reveals that Ottawa has emerged as the most livable major city in Canada, while North Vancouver, West Vancouver, and Pitt Meadows have topped their respective categories based on size. The editorial team, comprised of data editor Mahima Singh, consumer affairs reporter Mariya Postelnyak, and reporter Andrew Galbraith, addressed a myriad of reader questions, particularly regarding the methodology behind the rankings and the factors influencing the results.
Methodology Behind the Rankings
One of the focal points of the discussion was the criteria used to determine livability. Singh explained that the rankings utilise a variable known as the GreenLiving index, which assesses residents’ behaviours and attitudes towards environmental issues. This index encompasses 27 different factors, including the adoption of alternative energy sources, energy-efficient appliances, and modes of transportation such as walking and cycling.
Postelnyak highlighted that access to green spaces significantly contributed to cities climbing the rankings. Summerland, B.C., for instance, saw a remarkable rise of 171 places due to its investment in parks and recreational facilities. A notable $8.5 million was allocated for enhancements like an outdoor plaza and improved access to local trails, showcasing how community-focused investments can lead to substantial improvements in livability scores.
Housing Affordability and Its Impact
The topic of housing affordability generated considerable discussion, particularly given its impact on overall livability. Many cities that ranked highly did not necessarily score well on housing affordability. Galbraith shared personal insights, reflecting on the high costs of living in the Metro Vancouver area. He noted that while some residents are willing to compromise on housing costs for a better quality of life, this is not a universal sentiment.
Singh further elaborated on how Calgary’s significant drop of 71 places in the rankings was largely attributed to its declining scores in essential categories such as safety and housing. The city’s rapid population growth has placed pressure on local infrastructure, affecting its overall livability.
The B.C. Advantage
A recurring theme in the Q&A was the consistent high performance of British Columbia cities. When questioned about the integration of municipalities like North Vancouver, Galbraith acknowledged the historical blending of these communities and how they often function as a cohesive unit in practice, despite being administratively distinct. This cooperation extends to emergency services and recreational offerings, which enhances the collective livability of the region.
Why it Matters
The insights gleaned from the Canada’s Most Livable Cities rankings are more than just numbers; they reflect the ongoing challenges and opportunities faced by urban communities across the nation. As cities grapple with issues of housing affordability, environmental sustainability, and the need for accessible recreational spaces, these rankings highlight the importance of strategic investment and community planning. Understanding what makes a city livable can guide policymakers and residents alike in fostering environments that not only attract new residents but also enhance the quality of life for those already there. The conversation around livability is not just about where to live; it’s about how we can collectively make our communities better places for all.
