**
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s recent departure to India for a high-profile trade and goodwill mission has ignited a national security debate back home. As he engages in discussions with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, a senior Canadian official’s assertion that India has ceased its involvement in foreign interference concerning Canadian Sikhs has raised eyebrows. Critics, including politicians and security experts, are demanding clarification and a reassessment of these claims amid ongoing concerns about transnational repression.
Controversial Claims from Officials
Just before Carney’s departure, a senior government official, speaking at a confidential briefing, informed reporters that Ottawa does not believe India is currently interfering in Canada’s domestic affairs. This statement has come under fire, particularly from Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal, who labelled it “disconnected from reality.” Dhaliwal, a Canadian Sikh representing Surrey-Newton, insisted that the Prime Minister must clarify this stance and thoroughly review the qualifications of the official behind the remarks.
“This is totally not tolerable. This matter must be addressed without delay, and a formal review is a necessity,” he stated emphatically. The comments have sparked fears among members of the Sikh community, who have faced intimidation and violence linked to their support for an independent Sikh homeland known as Khalistan.
Responses from the Government
In a statement to The Globe and Mail, the Prime Minister’s Office defended the ongoing security dialogue with India but stopped short of outright rejecting the claims made by the senior official. “Canada will continue to take measures to combat any forms of transnational repression, transnational organized crime, and any contravention of the Criminal Code or rule of law on Canadian soil,” the statement read. It also highlighted the ongoing law enforcement dialogue between the two nations, suggesting a step-by-step approach to re-engagement with India.
Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree acknowledged that “there’s a lot more work to do” to prevent coercion or intimidation by Indian agents within Canada. Yet, during a recent appearance on CBC’s Power and Politics, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand did not disavow the senior official’s comments, maintaining that the Indo-Canadian security dialogue has yielded positive results.
Security Concerns Persist
The Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) has reiterated its commitment to addressing national security threats, regardless of their origin. Spokesperson Magali Hébert stated, “CSIS takes all allegations of foreign interference and transnational repression seriously,” emphasising the agency’s ongoing vigilance. This perspective was echoed by Dan Stanton, a former senior CSIS manager, who expressed scepticism regarding the senior official’s assertions, labelling them “naive.”
Stanton’s concerns stem from a long history of allegations of Indian interference in Canadian life, particularly against figures advocating for Khalistan. The official’s statement marks a stark contrast to the diplomatic tensions observed just 16 months ago, when Canada expelled six Indian diplomats over accusations of orchestrating violence against Canadian citizens, including the high-profile murder of Sikh activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar.
A Shift in Diplomatic Relations
Since Carney’s ascendance to the Prime Ministership, there has been a concerted effort to recalibrate diplomatic relations with India. Following the tensions that culminated in the expulsion of Indian diplomats, Carney extended an invitation to Modi for the Group of Seven summit in Alberta last year. This recent mission appears to be part of a broader strategy to mend ties, yet it raises questions about the underlying realities regarding foreign interference.
Stanton highlighted the potential ramifications of the current narrative, suggesting that the government may be attempting to justify its rapprochement with India. “India has said it is all lies and there is no evidence. So have they now said to the Canadian government we are not going to do the stuff we never admitted to doing anyway?” he questioned.
Why it Matters
This unfolding narrative surrounding the Prime Minister’s trip to India underscores a critical moment in Canada’s approach to national security and foreign relations. As the government grapples with allegations of foreign interference, clarity and transparency are imperative. The implications of these discussions extend beyond mere diplomatic niceties; they touch on the safety and wellbeing of communities within Canada, particularly the Sikh population, who feel vulnerable to external pressures. The call for a thorough examination of the government’s stance is not just a matter of political rhetoric; it is essential for restoring trust and ensuring the integrity of Canada’s democratic processes.