As tensions between Russia and NATO continue to rise, the prospect of a potential World War III has become increasingly palpable. Military experts warn that the current army numbers may not be sufficient, prompting discussions around the possibility of conscription.
According to Dr. Mike Martin, a former MP and ex-British Army officer, conscription would be necessary to bolster the country’s military capabilities. “We’re not at a stage yet where we can replace people with drones,” he told The Big Issue. “Drones are fine, as far as they go, but you still need people to occupy villages, hold ground, and all the rest of it. And that’s not going to change for quite some time.”
In the past, conscription has typically targeted young, fit men and single individuals without children, as was the case during World War II. However, this time, one group that has never before been drafted for direct combat could be called upon: women.
During World War II, women aged between 20 and 30 were conscripted for roles related to the war effort, including nursing, munitions, and auxiliary positions. While it is not certain that women will be drafted this time, a recent YouGov poll found that 72% of Britons support women fighting on the frontline.
The prospect of conscription has sparked a range of reactions from political leaders. Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer has claimed that “nobody is talking about conscription,” while former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak had previously proposed national service for all 18-year-olds.
General Sir Patrick Sanders, however, has warned the government that Britons should prepare for conscription “within six years” if the threat posed by Putin’s Russia does not subside.
As the world watches the geopolitical landscape unfold, the possibility of a global conflict has become a growing concern. While the certainty of a war remains uncertain, the preparations for such an eventuality are undoubtedly underway, with the potential expansion of conscription being a key consideration.