In a shocking display of violence, a gunman has been sentenced to over 13 years in prison for attempting to murder his victim over an outstanding drug debt. The incident, which unfolded in broad daylight on the streets of Glasgow, has been described by the judge as “terrifying criminal behaviour” that put innocent citizens at risk.
Jamie Purdie, 36, targeted Steven Gordon at his home in the Garthamlock area of Glasgow on 3 February 2025. Purdie opened fire on Gordon’s residence in what the judge called “a planned hit” before fleeing the scene. The two men then became embroiled in a high-speed car chase across the city, with Purdie eventually crashing his vehicle near the Fort shopping centre.
Undeterred, Purdie then fired another shot at Gordon, who had been pursuing him in a Land Rover. Purdie later told police he had been forced to carry out the crime due to a drug debt.
Appearing at the High Court in Glasgow, Purdie pleaded guilty to a number of charges, including attempted murder, as well as firearms and driving offences. He was sentenced to 13-and-a-half years in prison and will be supervised for a further three years upon his release. Purdie has also been banned from driving for 10 years.
In sentencing, Judge Louise Arrol KC emphasised that “innocent citizens are entitled to live their lives without being subjected to terrifying criminal behaviour” such as the discharge of firearms and dangerous driving. She added that “the sentence I am imposing will also send a message – the court will not allow people like you to cause fear in society.”
The court heard that Gordon, who was previously jailed for his involvement in the car chase and attack, had pleaded guilty to assaulting Purdie to his severe injury, permanent disfigurement and impairment, as well as to the danger of his life. He was sentenced to three years and six months in a separate hearing.
Rhonda Anderson, defending Purdie, said her client had been “reluctant” to get involved but was aware that others were watching him. Purdie had also accepted that he had “exposed the public to serious risk.”
This case serves as a stark reminder of the dangerous consequences that can arise from the drug trade and the lengths criminals will go to in order to settle debts. The court’s strong stance in handing down a significant sentence reflects the gravity of the offences and the need to protect the public from such reckless and violent behaviour.
