Education Secretary Defends Student Loan Threshold Freeze Amid Growing Graduate Concerns

Grace Kim, Education Correspondent
5 Min Read
⏱️ 4 min read

**

In a recent interview, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson addressed the controversial decision to freeze the repayment threshold for Plan 2 student loans in England, stating that graduates will, on average, see their monthly repayments increase by £8. The freeze, which will take effect next year, has sparked considerable debate, particularly among recent graduates facing financial strain.

Key Changes to Student Loan Repayments

Phillipson confirmed that while the repayment threshold will rise to £29,385 in April, it will subsequently be frozen for three years instead of adjusting with inflation. This decision has drawn criticism from many graduates, including Tinuke Bamiro, a 24-year-old consultant and social media creator, who has expressed concern over the financial implications. Bamiro, who is already facing a higher tax rate due to her earnings, finds the additional loan repayments burdensome. “The amount that I have to repay, especially on the income I make outside of my nine to five, is a lot,” she remarked.

The repayment threshold freeze is part of a larger landscape of discussions surrounding student loans, particularly those issued to undergraduates in England from September 2012 to July 2023. Campaigners are urging the government to reconsider the freeze, arguing that it places undue financial pressure on graduates during a time of rising living costs.

Government’s Position on the Freeze

In her comments on BBC Breakfast, Phillipson maintained that while the government understands the challenges graduates face, they must address multiple issues across the education sector. “We can’t fix everything at once,” she noted. The government has described its decision as “tough but fair,” suggesting that the increased repayments are manageable within the broader context of support initiatives, including measures related to childcare and public transport costs.

Government’s Position on the Freeze

Plan 2 loans accrue interest from the moment they are taken out at a rate of 6.2% during studies, which subsequently rises based on inflation rates. The Conservative Party has proposed capping the interest rate at the Retail Price Index (RPI), although this would not provide retroactive relief to existing borrowers.

Personal Stories Highlight Graduate Struggles

The impact of the repayment changes is palpable among graduates. Bamiro, who borrowed approximately £75,000 for her degree, now owes nearly £90,000. She has begun increasing her pension contributions to mitigate the higher-rate tax implications, which she believes allows her to retain more of her income. “I think this is a good alternative in some ways, in that I get to keep more of the money I make,” Bamiro said, although she expressed concern about her ability to save for a property deposit.

Similarly, George Holmes, a 27-year-old finance professional, has reduced his working hours to save money on tax and loan repayments. His decision to cut back has cost him around £80 a week, but he finds value in the time saved for personal projects. Holmes is also an advocate for the Rethink Repayment campaign, which seeks lower interest rates and a reversal of the repayment threshold freeze.

Calls for Comprehensive Reform

As dissatisfaction with the current student finance system mounts, opposition parties have joined the chorus for reform. The Liberal Democrats have proposed a complete overhaul to alleviate the financial burden on graduates, particularly those in public service roles. Such initiatives could involve writing off a portion of student debt after ten years of service in essential fields such as nursing and teaching.

Calls for Comprehensive Reform

Why it Matters

The freezing of the student loan repayment threshold represents a significant shift in the financial landscape for graduates, particularly during a period of economic uncertainty. With many young professionals already grappling with the cost of living crisis, the government’s decision could exacerbate financial pressures, ultimately affecting their ability to save for the future. As discussions continue, the call for a more equitable and supportive student finance system grows louder, highlighting the urgent need for policy changes that genuinely reflect the realities faced by today’s graduates.

Share This Article
Grace Kim covers education policy, from early years through to higher education and skills training. With a background as a secondary school teacher in Manchester, she brings firsthand classroom experience to her reporting. Her investigations into school funding disparities and academy trust governance have prompted official inquiries and policy reviews.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy