In a bold call to action, former Prime Minister Boris Johnson has proposed that the UK and its allies send non-combat troops to Ukraine immediately, arguing that such a move could significantly disrupt Russian President Vladimir Putin’s calculations. Johnson made these comments during an exclusive interview on BBC’s *Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg*, where he was joined by Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, the former chief of the UK military.
A Timely Proposal
Johnson’s remarks come just days before the fourth anniversary of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He questioned the rationale behind postponing troop deployment until after a potential ceasefire, asserting, “If we can have a plan for boots on the ground after the war, why not do it now?” His suggestion is to station troops in peaceful areas, thereby signalling unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty.
The UK government is currently collaborating with allies to devise a “coalition of the willing” aimed at stabilising Ukraine, but any troop deployment hinges on a formal peace agreement. Johnson believes that the West’s cautious approach has been detrimental, stating, “We’ve always delayed needlessly,” and emphasising that timely support would have benefitted Ukraine significantly.
Reflecting on Past Mistakes
During the interview, Johnson expressed regret about the West’s past inaction, particularly regarding Putin’s annexation of Crimea in 2014. He lamented that greater attention to Putin’s aggression could have averted the current war. “The failure to confront Putin over Crimea was tragic,” he said, arguing that Western missteps, including the lack of response to the Syrian conflict, emboldened the Russian leader.
Admiral Radakin echoed these sentiments, criticising the “incrementalism” of Western military support, which he described as frustratingly slow. Both men concurred that a more robust and immediate response from Western allies could have altered the course of the conflict.
The Government’s Position
In response to Johnson’s comments, Defence Secretary John Healey reiterated the government’s stance that British troops would only be dispatched following a peace deal. He stated, “I want to be the Defence Secretary who deploys British troops to Ukraine – because this will mean that this war is finally over.” Healey highlighted the UK’s ongoing military support and financial assistance to Ukraine, underscoring the importance of a strategic resolution over immediate troop deployment.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence responded to Johnson’s proposal, asserting, “We are proud of UK leadership on Ukraine – supporting the fight today and working to secure the peace tomorrow.”
Implications of Troop Deployment
Johnson’s suggestion of sending international troops to Ukraine, even in non-combat roles, raises complex geopolitical questions. While he argues that such a presence could demonstrate solidarity with Ukraine, it also risks escalating tensions with Russia. Putin has previously labelled any foreign troops in Ukraine as “legitimate targets,” indicating potential repercussions for such a move.
Admiral Radakin called for the UK to adhere to its commitment to increase defence spending, arguing that a robust military presence is essential for national security in an increasingly tense European landscape. “Russia is weak, but dangerous,” he noted, highlighting the need for a strategic approach to defence in the coming years.
Why it Matters
As the war in Ukraine draws closer to a grim anniversary, Johnson’s call for immediate troop deployment underscores a growing frustration among Western leaders regarding the pace of support to Ukraine. His remarks reflect a pivotal moment in the ongoing conflict, as leaders grapple with the balance between supporting Ukraine and avoiding direct confrontation with Russia. The implications of such a shift could redefine the dynamics of international military involvement in the region and shape the future of Ukraine’s struggle for sovereignty.
