Boris Johnson has called for the UK and its allies to send non-combat troops to Ukraine without delay, suggesting that such a move could significantly alter Russian President Vladimir Putin’s mindset. In a candid interview on *Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg*, the former Prime Minister argued that if there are plans for military presence post-war, then action should be taken now rather than waiting for a ceasefire.
Urgent Call for Action
During the interview, which featured Adm Sir Tony Radakin, the former head of the UK military, Johnson emphasised the need for troops to be stationed in peaceful areas of Ukraine, signalling a proactive stance against Russian aggression. He questioned the logic behind delaying such a deployment: “If we can have boots on the ground after the war, why not do it now?”
This statement comes as the UK government collaborates with international partners to establish a “coalition of the willing,” aimed at providing forces for peacekeeping purposes, but only contingent on a formal peace agreement. Johnson’s comments are particularly poignant as they coincide with the forthcoming fourth anniversary of the conflict, which he believes could have been averted with a stronger, unified response from Western nations.
Reflecting on Past Mistakes
Johnson and Sir Tony recounted the pivotal moments surrounding Russia’s invasion on 24 February 2022, highlighting a sense of regret over the West’s initial hesitancy in supporting Ukraine. They acknowledged that allies had been slow to respond to President Volodymyr Zelensky’s requests for military assistance. Sir Tony characterised this approach as “incrementalism,” which he noted has left Ukraine feeling frustrated and unsupported.
“Caution has cost lives,” Johnson asserted, arguing that delaying aid has repeatedly placed Ukraine at a disadvantage. He stressed that swift action in response to Ukraine’s needs is not only beneficial for the country but also undermines Putin’s position.
The Geopolitical Implications
Johnson’s remarks touch on broader geopolitical dynamics, suggesting that the presence of international troops could serve as a deterrent to Putin. However, he also acknowledged the risks involved, as the Russian leader has previously labelled any foreign troops in Ukraine as “legitimate targets.”
In response to Johnson’s advocacy, a Ministry of Defence spokesperson reaffirmed the UK’s commitment to supporting Ukraine, citing recent military aid and preparations for potential deployments. The spokesperson stated, “We are proud of UK leadership on Ukraine – supporting the fight today and working to secure the peace tomorrow.”
A Call for Defence Spending Commitment
Highlighting the need for increased defence spending, Sir Tony urged the government to honour its pledge made at the NATO summit last year, which aimed for a 3.5% allocation of national income towards defence by 2035. He remarked, “Russia is weak, but dangerous,” underscoring the necessity for robust military readiness in light of ongoing threats.
Johnson’s reflections on previous Western failures to confront Putin’s aggression, including the 2014 annexation of Crimea, illustrate a narrative of missed opportunities. He suggested that a lack of decisive action has emboldened the Kremlin, warning that until there is a clear commitment from the West to support Ukraine’s sovereignty, Putin may continue his aggressive tactics.
Why it Matters
The implications of Johnson’s call for troop deployment extend far beyond military strategy; they reflect a critical juncture in global diplomacy and the West’s resolve in supporting Ukraine. As the war enters its fourth year, the need for decisive action becomes increasingly urgent. Johnson’s remarks may reignite discussions among allies regarding their commitments and approach to the conflict, potentially reshaping the landscape of international relations in the region. With lives hanging in the balance, the question remains: how far are Western nations willing to go to ensure a free and independent Ukraine?
