Boris Johnson, the former Prime Minister of the UK, has called for the immediate dispatch of non-combat troops to Ukraine, asserting that such a move could alter the dynamics of the ongoing conflict with Russia. Speaking on the BBC’s *Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg*, Johnson argued that if plans are being formulated for post-conflict troop presence, there is no reason to delay action now.
Urgency for Peacekeeping Forces
In a conversation alongside former chief of the Defence Staff, Admiral Sir Tony Radakin, Johnson outlined his belief that deploying troops in non-combat roles to secure peaceful areas of Ukraine could “flip a switch” in the mindset of Russian President Vladimir Putin. He stated, “If we can have a plan for boots on the ground after the war, then why not do it now?” The UK government is currently engaged in discussions with allies to establish a “coalition of the willing” aimed at maintaining stability in Ukraine, contingent upon a formal ceasefire agreement.
Reflecting on the war’s fourth anniversary, Johnson expressed regret that the invasion could have been averted had Western nations paid closer attention to Putin’s escalating aggression, particularly following the annexation of Crimea in 2014. He and Sir Tony lamented the slow pace at which Western allies have responded to Ukrainian requests for military assistance, suggesting that this hesitancy has cost lives.
A Call for Action Amidst Hesitation
Johnson’s remarks come as a stark reminder of the protracted nature of the conflict. He critiqued the “incrementalism” of Western support, stating, “We’ve always delayed needlessly,” and emphasised that timely assistance could have benefitted Ukraine and undermined Putin. He reiterated that the primary objective is to empower Ukrainians, not to engage in combat, stating that peaceful deployments should be viewed as a show of solidarity rather than provocation.
The former Prime Minister’s comments, however, raise significant questions about the implications of such a deployment. While he insists that these forces would not engage in combat, the potential for escalating tensions with Russia remains high. Putin previously characterised any foreign troops in Ukraine as “legitimate targets,” underscoring the delicate balance that must be maintained in international military engagements.
Responses from Government Officials
In response to Johnson’s assertions, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence reiterated the UK’s commitment to supporting Ukraine, highlighting recent military aid packages and the acceleration of preparations for possible troop deployments. The spokesperson noted, “We are proud of UK leadership on Ukraine – supporting the fight today and working to secure the peace tomorrow.”
Johnson also reflected on historical missteps, arguing that the failure to adequately respond to prior acts of aggression by Putin, including the 2014 Crimea annexation, contributed to the current crisis. He stated, “The failure to do anything in Crimea was tragic.” He believes the West’s failure to confront Putin decisively at critical junctures has led to a perception of weakness that emboldened the Russian leader.
The Path Forward
As the war drags on, both Johnson and Sir Tony advocate for a more robust response to the Kremlin, arguing that intensifying economic and military pressure is essential for achieving peace. Johnson labelled any notion that Putin seeks peace as “deluded,” asserting a need for the West to convey a strong resolve regarding Ukraine’s sovereignty.
The discussion surrounding troop deployments, although controversial, highlights a growing frustration among some Western leaders that existing strategies are insufficient to bring about a resolution to the conflict.
Why it Matters
Johnson’s call for immediate troop deployment marks a significant shift in the dialogue surrounding Western involvement in Ukraine. As the conflict nears its fourth anniversary, the urgency for decisive action is palpable. The potential for increased military presence raises critical questions about international alliances, the response to Russian aggression, and the broader implications for global security. With lives at stake, the time for decisive action may be now, but it will require careful navigation of the complex geopolitical landscape.
