**
As tensions escalate in the Middle East, Israel is strategically positioning itself amid the uncertainty surrounding US military actions against Iran. While the Israeli government has largely refrained from publicly commenting on the situation, indications suggest that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu views this juncture as a pivotal opportunity to push for regime change in Tehran, potentially with the backing of the Trump administration.
A Calculated Silence
The quietude from Israeli leaders, particularly Netanyahu, is notable during this period of heightened military readiness by the US. Historically, Netanyahu has been vocal about his concerns regarding Iran, which he perceives as the primary threat to Israel’s security. However, experts believe that the current silence is a calculated move, allowing the US to take the lead in any potential military action.
Danny Citrinowicz, a seasoned analyst from Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies, emphasises the significance of this moment for Netanyahu. He observes that the Israeli Prime Minister is keen to capitalise on the presence of US forces in the Gulf, viewing it as a “golden moment” to advocate for a more aggressive stance against Iran. Asaf Cohen, a former intelligence officer, supports this perspective, suggesting that Israel’s leadership is strategically allowing the Americans to take centre stage due to their greater military capabilities and international legitimacy.
The Push for Regime Change
The desire for regime change in Iran is not merely a rhetorical flourish for Israeli officials. Reports indicate that Netanyahu is advocating for a robust US response to Iran’s activities, especially after he advised President Trump to reconsider his earlier, more tempered approach. The Israeli Prime Minister has historically called for Iranian citizens to rise against their government, and he appears to believe that a significant military action could facilitate such an outcome.
Currently, President Trump is weighing various options, ranging from limited strikes to comprehensive plans aimed at altering Iran’s political landscape. While allies express caution regarding the implications of such actions, many in Israel see an opportunity to neutralise threats posed by Iranian ballistic missiles and nuclear ambitions.
However, the prospect of regime change is fraught with risks. Israeli lawmakers like Moshe Tur-Paz argue that limited military action could leave the Iranian regime intact, potentially exacerbating the threats Israel faces. “When you deal with total evil, you don’t act limited,” he contends, highlighting a consensus among some factions in Israel that a decisive action is necessary.
Iranian Retaliation and Regional Stability
The potential for Iranian retaliation looms large. Following a 12-day conflict last year, in which Iran launched hundreds of missiles at Israeli targets, the spectre of renewed violence raises concerns about the stability of the region. Analysts warn that Iran’s military posture has adapted since those strikes, and its response to any new US-led attack could be more severe.
Iranian officials have publicly declared that any military aggression from the US would be met with an “immediate and unprecedented” response. The rhetoric suggests a heightened sense of vulnerability within Iran, particularly as it grapples with internal dissent and a weakening of its proxy forces across the region.
The Domestic Landscape in Israel
Amidst this geopolitical backdrop, Israeli citizens express a mix of hope and apprehension. Polls indicate strong support among the Jewish population for military action against Iran, reflecting a desire for enhanced security. Nonetheless, individuals like Shani, a young woman in Tel Aviv, voice concerns about the humanitarian implications of military interventions. “I know the Iranian people want the US to help. I just hope that everyone will stay safe,” she reflects, underscoring the complex human dimension of this conflict.
The potential fallout from regime change remains a contentious issue. With Iran’s leadership firmly united, the question of who might succeed the current regime adds layers of uncertainty. A chaotic transition could lead to further instability, not only for Iran but for the broader Middle Eastern landscape.
Why it Matters
The unfolding situation between Israel, the US, and Iran is emblematic of the intricate interplay of regional power dynamics and international diplomacy. As Israel positions itself strategically to advocate for regime change, the ramifications of any military action could reverberate throughout the region for years to come. The decisions made in this critical period will not only impact the immediate security landscape but could also redefine relationships and power structures across the Middle East, making it imperative for all stakeholders to tread carefully.
