**
In a recent visit to Armenia, US Vice President JD Vance inadvertently ignited a political storm when a social media post referencing the Armenian genocide was deleted shortly after its publication. This incident, which unfolded during a memorial visit to honour the 1.5 million victims of the atrocities committed over a century ago, has drawn sharp criticism from both the Armenian diaspora and opposition politicians in the United States.
A Historic Visit
Vance’s trip to Armenia, which took place on 10 February 2026, marked a significant moment as he became the first sitting US vice president to visit the country. Accompanied by his wife, Usha Vance, the vice president attended a memorial dedicated to the victims of the genocide, bringing attention to a historical event long overshadowed by diplomatic sensitivities.
In a now-deleted post from his official Twitter account, Vance referred to the tragic events as “the Armenian genocide,” a term that has historically been avoided by US administrations due to Turkey’s status as a crucial ally. However, an aide later clarified that this reference was made in error by staff not travelling with Vance, prompting outrage from various quarters.
Political Repercussions
The deletion of the post has incited fierce reactions from the Armenian community and political figures alike. Alex Galitsky, policy director for the Armenian National Committee of America, condemned Vance’s decision as cowardly, stating on social media that it was an “insult to the memory” of the deceased and an affront to those advocating for recognition of the genocide.
Aram Hamparian, executive director of the same organisation, suggested that the withdrawal of the statement was influenced by pressure from Turkey. He articulated frustration over what he perceived as Vance’s capitulation to foreign pressure, especially given the vice president’s vocal support for persecuted Christian communities.
The Armenian Assembly of America joined the chorus of criticism, demanding a clear explanation from the administration regarding its apparent reversal on the genocide issue. Co-chairs Talin Yacoubian and Oscar Tatosian issued a statement expressing disappointment and urging for better accountability from elected officials.
A Shift in Stance
Historically, US officials have refrained from using the term genocide due to concerns about straining ties with Turkey, which disputes the classification of the mass killings. This cautious approach was notably challenged by President Joe Biden in 2021 when he became the first US president to formally acknowledge the Armenian genocide, a bold move that reportedly led to diplomatic tensions with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
In stark contrast, the current administration has reverted to a more cautious stance, with Vance avoiding the term during his subsequent interactions in Armenia. He described the historical events merely as “a very terrible thing that happened a little over 100 years ago,” indicating a reluctance to confront the issue head-on.
Opposition Criticism
The incident has drawn scorn from opposition lawmakers, including Democratic Congressman Jim McGovern, who labelled the deletion of the post as “disgusting and pathetic.” McGovern noted, “The Armenian Genocide is a fact,” emphasising the importance of acknowledging historical truths rather than succumbing to diplomatic pressures.
This episode raises critical questions about the current administration’s priorities and its commitment to historical truths, especially concerning sensitive international relations.
Why it Matters
This unfolding situation highlights the ongoing tension between historical recognition and diplomatic relations in US foreign policy. The decision to delete a reference to the Armenian genocide not only reflects the complexities of international diplomacy but also underscores the struggles of minority communities seeking recognition and justice for historical atrocities. As the US navigates its relationships with allies like Turkey, the voices of those advocating for truth and accountability must not be silenced, as they play a crucial role in shaping a more just and informed society.
