In a surprising move, the Kremlin has announced the creation of a “Peace Council” for the Gaza Strip, and has extended an invitation to Russian President Vladimir Putin to join the initiative. This comes as the United States President Donald Trump has also announced plans to establish a “Board of Peace for Gaza,” which will feature former British Prime Minister Sir Tony Blair as part of the executive committee.
The Kremlin’s proposal for a “Peace Council” aims to bring together global leaders to address the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The council is expected to serve as a platform for diplomatic discussions and potential conflict resolution strategies. By inviting President Putin to participate, the Kremlin is positioning Russia as a key player in the efforts to find a peaceful solution to the longstanding crisis in the region.
Separately, President Trump has taken a different approach, announcing that he has asked 60 world leaders to become members of the “Board of Peace for Gaza.” This initiative is part of the Trump administration’s broader efforts to address the complex political and humanitarian issues in the Gaza Strip.
The inclusion of Sir Tony Blair on the executive committee of the “Board of Peace for Gaza” is seen as a significant move, given his previous involvement in Middle East peace negotiations during his tenure as British Prime Minister. Blair’s participation is likely to lend credibility and experience to the initiative, as the international community seeks to find a way to end the cycle of violence and instability in the region.
The competing proposals from the Kremlin and the White House highlight the complex geopolitical dynamics at play in the ongoing efforts to resolve the Gaza conflict. Both Russia and the United States are vying for influence in the region, and the establishment of these respective “peace councils” or “boards” can be seen as part of a broader struggle for diplomatic and strategic dominance.
As the situation in Gaza continues to be a source of concern for the international community, the success of these initiatives will largely depend on the willingness of all parties involved to engage in meaningful dialogue and compromise. The coming months will be crucial in determining whether these proposals can translate into tangible progress towards a lasting peace in the region.
