**
A recent survey conducted by BBC News has revealed that hundreds of general practitioners (GPs) in England have never denied a fit note for patients citing mental health issues. Among the 752 GPs who responded to the questionnaire, a significant majority—540—reported they have consistently approved such requests. This finding emerges amidst rising concerns about the fit note system, as the number of issued notes has surged in recent years, prompting calls for reform.
The Rise of Fit Notes in Mental Health
Fit notes, also known as sick notes, are issued when patients are unable to work due to health concerns, including mental health disorders. The latest data indicates that almost 850,000 additional fit notes were issued in the past year compared to six years prior. Alarmingly, in the last year alone, over 956,000 fit notes cited mental health and behavioural disorders as the primary reason for absence, significantly outpacing other medical conditions.
Despite the increasing volume of fit notes, the nature of their issuance raises questions about the role of GPs. While they are responsible for signing the majority of these documents, other healthcare professionals, such as nurses and occupational therapists, are also authorised to issue them. Notably, a substantial proportion—72%—of fit notes do not specify the underlying reason for the absence, highlighting a lack of transparency in the data.
GPs Voice Concerns Over Their Role
The responses from GPs to the BBC survey revealed a common sentiment: signing off patients for work absence is an unfair burden for family doctors. Many expressed frustration with the current system, stating that it undermines the essential doctor-patient relationship. One GP poignantly noted, “It is hard to be a patient’s advocate and a judge.” This sentiment was echoed by several practitioners who expressed concern that the responsibility to determine fitness for work should not rest solely with them.

Some GPs shared experiences of patients becoming aggressive when fit notes were not granted. The pressure to comply with patient requests can lead to situations where GPs feel compelled to approve notes for fear of confrontation. As one practitioner put it, “It would be insane to challenge the patient,” reflecting a troubling dynamic that prioritises immediate conflict avoidance over long-term health considerations.
The Need for Systemic Change
The growing number of fit notes raises broader questions about the adequacy of support provided to individuals experiencing mental health challenges. The Royal College of GPs (RCGP) has indicated that family doctors may not always be the most suitable professionals to provide prolonged support for returning patients to work. While GPs are encouraged to issue fit notes for up to three weeks, there is a clear need for a systemic review of how such assessments are conducted.
A government-commissioned report has pointed out that GPs often lack the time and training to make accurate assessments about a patient’s ability to work. The longer a patient remains off work, the less likely they are to return; the report highlighted that after four to six weeks of absence, the chances of returning to work drop significantly.
In response to these challenges, the government is exploring alternative approaches to fit notes, including potential collaborations with businesses and occupational health professionals. Some companies, like Jaguar Land Rover, are already implementing wellness initiatives that focus on prevention and support, suggesting a proactive model could be more effective than the current system.
Why it Matters
As the UK grapples with soaring sickness absence rates, the implications of the fit note system extend beyond individual health concerns. The current framework not only impacts the wellbeing of employees but also poses a challenge to economic productivity and employer responsibilities. The rising number of fit notes related to mental health underscores the urgent need for a more nuanced approach that fosters trust and compassion between healthcare providers and patients. Addressing these systemic issues can have far-reaching benefits, ensuring that individuals receive the support they need while also enabling them to participate meaningfully in the workforce.
