A music instructor previously employed at Wimbledon Park Primary School has managed to evade a ban from teaching, despite being reported for displaying signs of intoxication while conducting a drum lesson. The Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) found insufficient evidence to support claims that Nicholas Smalley had consumed alcohol on school grounds.
Incident at Wimbledon Park Primary School
Nicholas Smalley was dismissed from his position in December 2023 after allegations arose regarding his behaviour while teaching. During a professional conduct hearing, a witness recounted her experience of observing Smalley in the classroom, where she immediately detected a “very strong smell of alcohol.” Upon questioning, Smalley acknowledged he had been drinking, later expressing remorse.
The witness reported that she spotted a can of Red Bull and a large bottle of tonic water on the piano, which contained a clear liquid. When asked about the contents of the bottle, Smalley claimed it was filled with water. Despite the witness’s assertion that he appeared “absolutely plastered” and unable to comprehend the situation, no alcohol was found in the classroom after he left.
Panel’s Findings
Although the TRA panel accepted that Smalley seemed under the influence, they ruled that there was not enough evidence to confirm he had been drinking on school premises or during lessons. The panel noted that he had a commendable record of over 27 years in teaching without prior incidents, highlighting that this behaviour was out of character for him.
Despite the serious nature of the allegations, the panel expressed concern that banning Smalley would deprive the educational community of his specialised teaching skills. They acknowledged the potential negative impact on public perception regarding teachers, but ultimately decided that a prohibition order was not warranted.
Expert Opinions
Marc Carvey, chief executive of the TRA, stated, “A prohibition order is not proportionate or in the public interest. The publication of these findings will serve as a sufficient reminder to the teacher regarding acceptable standards of behaviour.” The panel’s decision reflects a balanced approach, considering both the teacher’s past conduct and the implications for the wider educational community.
Why it Matters
This case raises significant questions about the standards expected from educators and the implications of their personal struggles on their professional conduct. While the decision not to impose a ban may be seen as lenient, it underscores the importance of supporting teachers facing personal difficulties. Ensuring that educators maintain professionalism is crucial for safeguarding the integrity of the educational system, while also recognising the human aspects of their lives that may affect their performance.
