NS&I’s Modernisation Effort Criticised as a “Full-Spectrum Disaster” by Parliamentary Committee

James Reilly, Business Correspondent
4 Min Read
⏱️ 3 min read

A recent report by parliament’s Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has condemned the National Savings and Investments (NS&I) modernisation initiative as a “full-spectrum disaster,” highlighting significant cost overruns and insufficient progress. The state-owned savings bank, known for its premium bond cash-prize draw, now faces scrutiny for exposing taxpayers to alarming financial risks amid a spiralling budget for its transformation programme.

Escalating Costs and Limited Progress

Originally launched in 2020 as Project Rainbow, the NS&I modernisation programme aimed to streamline operations and reduce expenses by replacing its long-standing banking service provider, Atos, with multiple smaller contracts. However, the projected costs have ballooned from £1.3 billion to an eye-watering £3 billion, with little to show in terms of actual transformation, according to the PAC report.

The report further reveals that NS&I may have to extend its contract with Atos, which encountered financial difficulties in 2024, potentially prolonging their partnership until 2031. This reliance on Atos raises concerns, especially given the sensitive nature of customer data involved in the core banking operations.

Lack of Strategic Oversight

The PAC’s findings indicate that NS&I leadership significantly underestimated the complexity of the modernisation process, setting an unrealistic deadline for completion by March 2024. The committee underscored a troubling dependency on external consultants, with NS&I reportedly spending £43 million on advisory services without establishing a coherent and integrated plan for the programme’s execution.

Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the PAC, expressed his deep concerns over the lack of clarity surrounding the project’s status. “It is deeply worrying to see a project in such an important organisation so off-track that neither this committee, nor at times the Treasury itself, could gain an accurate sounding on costs and progress,” he stated. The PAC’s call for a more realistic plan reflects growing apprehension that taxpayer money may be wasted on a project lacking robust oversight.

Treasury Support Amid Uncertainty

Despite the evident challenges, the Treasury announced an additional £109 million in funding for the NS&I modernisation programme, pending parliamentary approval. Yet, NS&I has been unable to provide a clear account of past expenditures, further complicating the situation. The committee’s report questions the organisation’s financial management, suggesting a potential disconnect between NS&I’s objectives and fiscal accountability.

In response to the PAC’s criticisms, NS&I has welcomed the report and its recommendations. They stated, “Our business transformation programme is key to NS&I continuing to deliver cost-effective finance for government and the services customers want.” The organisation committed to exploring options for improved programme delivery and promised to provide updates in due course.

Why it Matters

The implications of this report extend far beyond NS&I, as it raises critical questions about accountability and financial prudence in public sector projects. With over £240 billion held for approximately 25 million customers, NS&I plays a vital role in the UK’s financial landscape. The outcome of its modernisation efforts could set a precedent for future public sector initiatives, underscoring the need for rigorous oversight and realistic planning to safeguard taxpayer interests. As this situation unfolds, the focus will remain on whether NS&I can turn its fortunes around, ensuring that both its operational efficiency and public trust are restored.

Why it Matters
Share This Article
James Reilly is a business correspondent specializing in corporate affairs, mergers and acquisitions, and industry trends. With an MBA from Warwick Business School and previous experience at Bloomberg, he combines financial acumen with investigative instincts. His breaking stories on corporate misconduct have led to boardroom shake-ups and regulatory action.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy