**
A recent report has ignited fierce criticism of Serco, the government contractor responsible for court custody services, following its decision to dismantle artworks designed to uplift detainees in court cells across England and Wales. The removal of these vibrant murals, created by inmates at HMP Doncaster, has been labelled “petty and vindictive” by advocates who argue that such efforts to enhance the bleak environment of court custody are crucial for detainee well-being.
Artworks Designed to Inspire
The contentious decision was highlighted in the Lay Observers’ annual report, an independent body tasked with monitoring conditions in court custody suites. This comprehensive review, encompassing 759 visits and nearly 2,000 hours of observation, uncovered a stark reality: many custody areas remain dismal, often situated underground with minimal natural light. The artworks, featuring motivational quotes—including an inspiring line from Madonna—were intended to inject a sense of hope and positivity into these otherwise stark surroundings.
One notable quote read, “No matter who you are, no matter where you come from, you can always change and become a better version of yourself,” echoing the sentiments of rehabilitation and personal growth that are central to the prison reform dialogue.
Controversial Context
This incident is not isolated. It follows a similar controversy from July 2023, when then-immigration minister Robert Jenrick ordered the covering of colourful murals at an asylum centre for children, asserting they were “too welcoming.” This pattern of removing uplifting artistic representations has raised questions about the government’s attitude towards the treatment of vulnerable populations within the justice system.
Serco’s decision to strip these artworks from custody suites has been met with outrage from various stakeholders, including David Whalley, national chair of Lay Observers. Whalley emphasised the necessity of safeguarding vulnerable individuals, stating, “The experiences documented in this report demonstrate that the current situation is not acceptable and underline the need for sustained and coordinated action.”
Systemic Failures in Court Custody
The report highlights not only the removal of art but also significant systemic failures within the court custody estate. While some improvements have been made—such as dedicated accommodation for children in certain courts—serious issues persist. For instance, detainees have faced excessively long waits: one individual spent ten hours in custody for a mere nine-minute hearing, while another underwent a five-hour transport journey merely to access a video link.
The report also noted alarming statistics regarding the transport of vulnerable individuals. In a shocking 44% of monitored cases, women were transported alongside men with histories of sexual offences or domestic violence. Such practices raise critical concerns over safety and the psychological impact on those involved.
Voices of Concern
Prominent figures within the penal reform movement have voiced their discontent regarding the removal of the artworks. Andrew Neilson of the Howard League for Penal Reform remarked on the irony of destroying a potential source of hope amidst ongoing court delays and remand overuse. Mark Day, deputy director of the Prison Reform Trust, echoed this sentiment, stating that the removal of the artworks could detract from efforts to create a more humane environment within custody suites.
A spokesperson for Serco defended the removal, asserting their commitment to providing a safe environment for detainees, claiming that they are collaborating with the HM Prison and Probation Service to improve the aesthetics of court custody suites. Meanwhile, a Ministry of Justice representative reiterated the importance of maintaining safety and appropriate conditions for those in custody.
Why it Matters
The decision to remove artworks that foster hope and positivity from court custody suites underscores a troubling trend within the criminal justice system. As the report reveals, the conditions faced by detainees remain challenging, with instances of systemic failures and inadequate support for vulnerable individuals. The erasure of creative expressions intended to uplift these individuals not only reflects a lack of compassion but also a missed opportunity to enhance the rehabilitative environment within the justice system. In a landscape marked by ongoing debates over prison conditions and the treatment of detainees, every effort to humanise these spaces should be championed, not discarded.
