Public consultations are currently taking place regarding a new all-season resort planned for Alberta’s scenic Kananaskis Country. Announced by the provincial government in December, this initiative aims to establish three new resort areas—Castle, Fortress, and Nakiska. Officials assert that the development will generate thousands of jobs and deliver significant economic benefits, potentially amounting to billions of dollars. However, the project has ignited a debate over its environmental implications, particularly concerning local wildlife and ecosystems.
Overview of the Development Plans
The proposed resort at Fortress Mountain, situated approximately 125 kilometres west of Calgary, represents a revitalisation of a site that has remained largely dormant since its ski lifts ceased operation in 2004. Currently, the only recreational offering is Cat skiing. The ambitious plans for Fortress Mountain include the construction of hotels, gondola systems, extensive trail networks, and opportunities for private real estate development. Proponents claim that the project could create over 1,000 jobs, significantly boosting the local economy.
At a recent open house held at Mount Royal University in Calgary, David McKenna from Ridge North America, in collaboration with Western Securities, sought to gauge public sentiment regarding the project. “What we’re doing right now is trying to figure out exactly where the points are that Albertans generally would like to see as part of this project or not see,” McKenna stated. “We really want to get as much information as we possibly can.”
Environmental Concerns Raised
Despite the promised economic advantages, opposition is mounting from environmental advocates who express deep concerns about the potential consequences of increased human activity in a sensitive ecosystem. Gareth Thomson, representing the Biosphere Institute of the Bow Valley, pointed out that the environmental assessments conducted thus far are inadequate. “The environmental assessment that was done failed to answer many of those questions and is insufficient. We cannot support the development as it’s proposed,” he said, highlighting the fact that Kananaskis Country already attracts five million visitors annually—outpacing even Banff National Park.
Chloe Hahn from the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society shared similar concerns, warning that the development overlaps crucial wildlife habitats, including those for species such as grizzly bears and wolverines. “We also have critical habitat for threatened bull trout overlapping with the site,” Hahn added, underscoring the delicate balance between economic development and environmental preservation.
Future Consultations and Next Steps
Further public consultations are scheduled, with the next meeting taking place in Edmonton on 23 February. As discussions continue, community members are encouraged to voice their opinions and concerns regarding the project. The provincial government, while promoting the economic benefits of the resort, must also consider the feedback from residents and environmental groups to ensure a balanced approach to development.
Why it Matters
The proposed all-season resort in Kananaskis Country encapsulates a broader conversation about the intersection of economic growth and environmental stewardship. With the potential for substantial job creation and economic stimulation, it is crucial that the voices of local communities and environmental advocates are not only heard but factored into the decision-making process. As Alberta navigates its path towards sustainable development, the outcome of this project could set a precedent for future initiatives within the province and beyond. Balancing the allure of economic prosperity with the need to protect vulnerable ecosystems will be vital in shaping the future of Alberta’s natural landscapes.
