Reform UK Proposes Controversial Border Agency Modelled on US ICE

David Chen, Westminster Correspondent
4 Min Read
⏱️ 3 min read

Reform UK is set to unveil a radical immigration strategy, including the establishment of a new agency reminiscent of the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), capable of detaining up to 24,000 migrants at once. Zia Yusuf, the party’s newly appointed home affairs spokesperson, will present these proposals in a speech aimed at reshaping the UK’s approach to immigration.

Ambitious Plans for Immigration Reform

In a move that has drawn sharp criticism, Reform UK is poised to announce a series of measures designed to overhaul the immigration system. Key among these is the proposed deportation agency, which would facilitate the removal of as many as 288,000 individuals each year. Yusuf will assert that the current system has failed and that strong action is necessary to restore public confidence and security.

Additionally, the party plans to eliminate indefinite leave to remain, replacing it with a five-year renewable work visa and a special spouse visa. These changes reflect a broader strategy to tighten immigration controls and enhance the government’s ability to manage borders effectively.

New Surveillance and Counter-Terrorism Measures

The speech will also introduce a controversial rule mandating automatic home searches for individuals flagged by multiple corroborating authorities under the Prevent counter-terrorism programme. This proposal has raised alarms about potential civil liberties violations and the adequacy of oversight measures.

New Surveillance and Counter-Terrorism Measures

Critics, including Labour and Amnesty International, have quickly condemned these initiatives. Labour’s chairwoman, Anna Turley, accused Reform UK of pursuing divisive politics that threaten the fabric of British society, while Amnesty International highlighted concerns over the scapegoating of migrants to justify aggressive deportation policies.

Broader Policy Changes on the Horizon

Alongside the immigration proposals, Yusuf’s address is expected to cover a range of additional policies. These include imposing “visa freezes” on countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Syria if they refuse to accept deported migrants. The party also plans to ensure that all churches receive immediate legal protection to prevent their conversion into mosques, which they claim is vital for preserving Britain’s Christian heritage.

Further, immediate termination of Universal Credit for foreign nationals has been proposed, along with plans to conduct charter flights for deportations up to five times daily, supported by the RAF. Reform UK has promised to provide financial details regarding these initiatives, which remain unclear at this stage.

Response from the Opposition

Labour has been quick to respond, asserting that the proposed reforms are not only un-British but also detrimental to the nation’s values of tolerance and diversity. The party emphasizes that while it supports firm border control, it stands firmly against measures that would harm families and settled communities.

Response from the Opposition

Sir Keir Starmer, the Labour leader, has articulated a vision for a more inclusive society, contrasting it sharply with Reform UK’s approach. He insists that the current system must be reformed, but without resorting to punitive measures that jeopardise the rights of those who have integrated into British life.

Why it Matters

The proposed reforms by Reform UK signal a significant shift in immigration policy and could reshape the political landscape as debates around national identity, security, and human rights intensify. As these plans unfold, they will likely provoke fierce discussions about the balance between maintaining order and upholding the values of a diverse and inclusive society. The implications of such policies extend beyond immigration, touching on issues of social cohesion and the very definition of what it means to be British in the 21st century.

Share This Article
David Chen is a seasoned Westminster correspondent with 12 years of experience navigating the corridors of power. He has covered four general elections, two prime ministerial resignations, and countless parliamentary debates. Known for his sharp analysis and extensive network of political sources, he previously reported for Sky News and The Independent.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2026 The Update Desk. All rights reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy