**
In a significant development for female veterans in Canada, five out of the twelve members of the Women Veterans Council have resigned following a meeting with Veterans Affairs Minister Jill McKnight. The council, established to guide the government on the implementation of recommendations from the 2024 Invisible No More report, has faced criticism over a perceived lack of commitment from the department to address the unique challenges faced by women in the military.
Growing Discontent Among Council Members
The decision to step down was influenced by concerns voiced during an earlier meeting with Minister McKnight. Retired Sergeant Jessica Miller, one of the departing members, expressed frustration over what she described as the minister’s limited engagement with critical issues affecting female veterans. These issues include the distinct trauma experienced by women, particularly related to sexual assault, and the inadequacy of combat gear designed without consideration for women’s physical needs.
Miller lamented that the government has pulled back funding for essential research into female veterans’ health, neglected to provide a budget for the council’s operations, and delayed issuing clear directives. This lack of support has hindered the council’s ability to connect with other female veterans, further complicating their mission to inform the minister’s work.
Historical Context: The Invisible No More Report
The establishment of the Women Veterans Council stemmed from the landmark Invisible No More report, which was a comprehensive investigation into the experiences of female soldiers conducted by the House of Commons’ veterans affairs committee. This study marked the first time such a significant focus was placed on the unique struggles of female members of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).
The report, which included testimonies from over 90 witnesses, highlighted the physical and emotional toll that military service can take on women. Issues raised included the inadequacy of ballistic gear that does not accommodate women’s bodies and the neglect of service-related infertility concerns. The report recommended the creation of a council to provide ongoing advice on research priorities, transition support, and equitable access to benefits for female veterans.
A Collective Statement of Concern
Following their resignations, the departing council members issued an open letter aimed at clarifying the reasons behind their decision. They stressed that their collective departure should not be seen as a failure of women working together, but rather as indicative of deeper systemic issues within Veterans Affairs Canada. The letter underscored the ongoing challenges in translating policy intent into actionable support for women veterans.
“We were just gaslit and we don’t know why,” Miller stated in a recent interview, reflecting the frustration felt among council members regarding their interactions with the department.
In response to the resignations, Minister McKnight issued a statement expressing gratitude for the contributions of the departing members. “Their efforts have helped shape important conversations,” she noted, while also emphasising that the advisory group’s voluntary nature allows for members to pursue other opportunities as they see fit.
The Political Landscape
The resignation of these council members has raised concerns among political critics, including Conservative veterans’ affairs spokesperson Blake Richards. He argued that the treatment of veterans could have repercussions on military recruitment efforts. “Nobody in their right mind is going to want to join our military if they know that when they leave, they will be treated the way veterans are being treated right now,” Richards asserted, highlighting the urgent need for reform.
Despite attempts to reach current council members for comment, responses have been scarce, and Veterans Affairs has not provided clarity regarding the funding cuts affecting research into female veterans’ health.
Why it Matters
The resignations from the Women Veterans Council shine a light on the persistent challenges faced by female veterans in Canada. As the government grapples with how to support this demographic effectively, the voices of these former council members underscore the critical need for genuine engagement and committed action. Without addressing these issues, the Canadian military risks alienating current and future service members, potentially undermining its recruitment and retention efforts. The path forward must prioritise the unique experiences of women in the armed forces to ensure that their sacrifices are recognised and adequately supported.
