**
As Donald Trump intensifies his assault on environmental regulations, the climate movement appears to be faltering, with critics highlighting a troubling lack of response from key figures in politics and activism. The former president’s administration is dismantling crucial climate protections at an alarming pace, raising concerns about the future of climate action in the United States and beyond.
An Unprecedented Assault on Climate Science
In recent months, Trump’s administration has taken bold steps to undermine the legal framework supporting climate action. The repeal of the 2009 “endangerment finding” is one of the most significant blows, as it classified greenhouse gas emissions as a threat to public health. This move is seen as a long-sought victory for climate deniers, who have long argued against the legitimacy of climate science.
Marc Morano, a prominent figure in the climate denial movement, expressed his astonishment at the apparent complacency of Democrats, billionaires, and environmental activists during a recent right-wing gathering in Zurich. “In my 26 years of being focused on climate, I’ve never seen anything like this,” Morano stated, highlighting the stark absence of pushback against Trump’s aggressive fossil fuel policies.
Experts in climate studies corroborate Morano’s claims, indicating that the current political landscape has shifted dramatically. Robert Brulle, an environmental sociologist, lamented the dismantling of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, describing it as a critical loss for climate science in the US, which did not elicit a significant public outcry.
The Retreat of Democratic Leadership
Rather than mounting a robust defence against the administration’s climate policies, Democratic representatives appear to be retreating from discussions on climate change. This shift has sparked internal debates within the party over whether to prioritise economic concerns over environmental action, despite polling indicating that a substantial majority of the American public—63%—supports a focus on clean energy initiatives.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has been vocal in urging party members to disregard the so-called “climate hush” narrative. He asserts that the dangers posed by fossil fuel pollution necessitate a firm stance on climate advocacy. Genevieve Guenther, a climate communications expert, echoed this sentiment, describing the Democratic silence on climate issues as politically misguided and detrimental to their credibility.
Corporate Complicity and the Media’s Role
The corporate landscape has seen a notable shift as well, with tech giants like Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates sidelining their previous climate commitments. Morano remarked on the “flips on climate” from these figures, pointing to a shift in priorities as they grapple with the energy demands of their growing AI enterprises. Gates, in particular, has come under scrutiny for promoting a controversial stance that downplays the urgency of climate change.
Moreover, the media’s approach to covering Trump’s environmental policies seems to have softened. Morano noted a lack of rigorous questioning from journalists, even when administration officials dismiss climate change as a mere ideology. This reduction in journalistic scrutiny contrasts sharply with the heightened tensions during Trump’s first term, where environmental officials faced significant media backlash.
A Global Silence on Climate Issues
The phenomenon of climate silence is not confined to the United States. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, discussions surrounding climate change were notably muted compared to previous years. Anjali Chaudhry, a business sustainability researcher, highlighted the polarising nature of climate discussions in contemporary politics, leading many leaders to avoid the topic altogether.

Despite the silence from those in power, a vast majority of the global population—89%—continues to support climate action. This disconnect between public sentiment and political discourse underscores the urgent need for renewed conversations about climate change.
Why it Matters
The current landscape of climate activism is deeply concerning. As key political figures and corporate leaders retreat from climate discourse, the urgency of the climate crisis risks becoming lost in the noise of political strategy. The lack of pushback against Trump’s aggressive dismantling of environmental regulations not only jeopardises scientific progress but also undermines public understanding of the climate emergency. If the momentum for climate action continues to wane amidst rising temperatures and worsening environmental conditions, future generations may bear the brunt of this alarming silence.