As the UK government conducts a nationwide review of road safety measures, a contentious debate has emerged over the use of hidden speed cameras. While some argue that visible deterrents are more effective, others believe that covert enforcement is necessary to curb the persistent issue of speeding.
The discussion was sparked by a reader’s query to The Update Desk, questioning the purpose of speed limits if drivers can easily slow down in advance of known camera locations only to resume excessive speeds afterwards. Amy from Cornwall expressed frustration at seeing vehicles “zooming down local roads at way more than 20 or 30mph,” despite the presence of flashing signs indicating their speed.
Proponents of hidden cameras argue that they are a more effective deterrent, as drivers would be less able to anticipate their presence and adjust their behaviour accordingly. “If you want people to slow down, make them highly visible,” said one reader. “If you want to generate revenue, hide the cameras.”
However, others contend that visible speed cameras serve an important purpose in raising awareness and encouraging drivers to comply with limits. “There’s no point driving at 30mph on a housing estate,” argued one commenter. “You just get to the next queue 30 seconds sooner.”
The debate also touches on the broader issue of road safety and the role of technology in enforcement. Some readers suggested that speed limiters or “black boxes” in vehicles could be a more effective solution, while others called for increased fines and mandatory speed awareness courses to change driver behaviour.
As the government’s consultation progresses, it remains to be seen whether hidden speed cameras will be part of the solution to the UK’s road safety challenges. What is clear, however, is that the issue continues to divide opinions and spark lively discussion among drivers, pedestrians and policymakers alike.
