As Prime Minister Keir Starmer navigates the turbulent political landscape, he has found himself accused of performing a series of U-turns on key policies, a criticism levelled by Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch during a fiery exchange in the House of Commons.
The latest reversal, on the government’s plans for mandatory digital ID cards, has sparked a fierce debate within Whitehall, with ministers acknowledging the need to prioritise issues that resonate with the public, such as the cost-of-living crisis. However, the proliferation of policy U-turns has raised concerns about the government’s competence and decision-making processes.
Cabinet ministers have privately admitted that the “barnacle-scraping” strategy, pioneered by Australian political strategist Lynton Crosby a decade ago, is being employed by Starmer’s team. This approach involves shedding unpopular policies in favour of focusing on core issues believed to resonate with swing voters, such as the economy, welfare, and immigration.
The prime minister’s allies insist that this tactical shift is necessary to ensure the government’s plans achieve their intended objectives, but the opposition has seized on the U-turns as a sign of weakness and indecision. Labour sources have expressed frustration at the “walking up and down the hill” on various policies, warning that it is damaging loyalty within the parliamentary party and emboldening other MPs to defy the government.
Downing Street insiders have defended Starmer, arguing that the emphasis on the cost-of-living crisis is not just a “soundbite” but a genuine priority for the government. However, some cabinet ministers have pointed the finger of blame at the prime minister himself, questioning his judgment and the competence of the administration.
As the government navigates a series of political landmines, the Conservative opposition has wasted no time in capitalising on the perceived missteps. Badenoch’s taunts during Prime Minister’s Questions have highlighted the government’s vulnerability, underscoring the need for Starmer and his team to regain the initiative and demonstrate a clear, coherent vision for the country.
With local elections looming in May, the pressure is on Starmer to prove that his party can deliver on its promises and avoid the pitfalls that have plagued the government in recent weeks. The coming months will be a crucial test of his leadership and the resilience of his administration.
