**
In a striking warning, England’s largest teaching union has raised alarms about the government’s ability to implement meaningful reforms for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). The National Education Union (NEU) has stated that a lack of adequate staffing and resources threatens the ambitious plans set forth by the government, which aims to enhance inclusion in mainstream schools.
An Overwhelming Challenge
Daniel Kebede, NEU general secretary, has articulated the consensus among educators: the aspiration for inclusivity cannot be achieved without substantial investment. “Inclusion cannot be done on the cheap,” Kebede asserted, emphasising that teachers feel overwhelmed by the current pressures and limitations.
The backdrop to these concerns is the government’s recent announcement of significant reforms to the SEND system, unveiled in February. These plans include the establishment of “inclusion bases”—dedicated spaces within schools designed specifically for pupils with SEND. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has promised increased funding to support these initiatives, claiming that the government is committed to a “once-in-a-generation” overhaul aimed at embedding inclusion at the very heart of education.
Financial Commitments Under Scrutiny
The government has pledged an additional £4 billion from now until 2029 to prepare schools for the impending changes. Of this, £1.6 billion will be allocated directly to early years settings, schools, and colleges over the next three years as part of an “inclusion fund.” Another £1.8 billion is earmarked for expert support during the transition, alongside training for staff and local authorities.
Phillipson defended this funding during an appearance on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, stating: “We’re investing more. I’m determined to transform this system, to deliver better life chances for children. We are investing up front to make that happen.” However, the NEU has challenged the sufficiency of this funding, arguing that it may only equate to a part-time teaching assistant for an average primary school, and two for a secondary school.
Kebede highlighted the financial strain on schools as they strive to meet even modest pay increases for teachers, suggesting that the inclusion fund would merely “soften the blow of underfunding.” He pointed out that while the government faces difficult economic choices, investing in education today could yield significant savings in the long run.
Voices from the Frontline
As the NEU gears up for its annual conference in Brighton, a recent survey of its members paints a concerning picture. Out of approximately 10,300 teachers and 3,000 support staff surveyed, an overwhelming 86% reported that inadequate staffing was a major barrier to achieving inclusion. Additionally, 73% indicated that excessive workload hindered their ability to support students effectively.
Teachers have expressed worries about large class sizes, insufficient training, and the current system’s challenges in facilitating timely access to specialist support for identifying children’s needs. One of the pivotal reforms includes the introduction of Individual Support Plans (ISPs) for every child with SEND, which aims to ensure that many more students can receive their necessary support within mainstream educational settings.
The Impacts of Change
The government aims for only children with the most complex needs to qualify for an education, health, and care plan (EHCP) by 2035. Over the past decade, the number of children with EHCPs has nearly doubled, and while this trend is expected to continue in the short term, officials hope that these reforms will eventually stabilise the figures.
Despite these intentions, the NEU has voiced concerns about how these changes will impact teachers’ workloads, with Kebede reiterating that while educators desire to provide inclusive education, they are being stretched too thin. “They want to see an inclusive school system,” he stated, “but the reality is they are being asked to do much more with fewer resources—the situation is becoming untenable.”
Looking Ahead
Recent research from an independent charity underscores the challenges schools in England will face as they prepare for these forthcoming changes. The National Foundation for Educational Research (NFER) indicates that while progress is being made in recruitment and retention of teachers, there is a concerning trend of teaching assistants leaving the profession. It is estimated that one in five support staff may exit the school system between 2023 and 2025, a troubling prospect given their crucial role in providing tailored support for students with special needs.
In response to the NEU’s criticisms, the Department for Education has reiterated its commitment to supporting schools through its £4 billion investment, asserting its ambition for every child. Currently, consultations are underway to gather feedback from parents and educators regarding the proposed reforms.
As the NEU convenes for its annual conference, the potential impact of these changes will be a focal point of discussion. Political dynamics are also at play, with the leader of the Green Party, Zack Polanski, scheduled to address attendees. Kebede has noted that Polanski has emerged as a highly favoured figure among union members, which signals a growing discontent with the current Labour government’s approach to education.
Why it Matters
The discussions surrounding SEND reforms highlight a critical juncture in educational policy in England. As the government strives for an inclusive educational framework, the voices of teachers and support staff must be heard. Their concerns about funding and resources are not just bureaucratic details; they represent the lived experiences of educators who are dedicated to nurturing every child’s potential. If the government fails to address these pressing issues, the ambitious vision for inclusivity could remain unfulfilled, leaving vulnerable students without the support they desperately need.
