**
In a controversial statement that has ignited fierce backlash from gun rights advocates, Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., declared that anyone bringing a firearm into the nation’s capital—regardless of their legal standing elsewhere—will face incarceration. This declaration has struck a nerve within pro-Second Amendment circles, with critics accusing her of undermining gun rights at a pivotal moment in American politics.
Pirro’s Stark Warning
During a recent appearance on Fox News, Pirro issued a stark ultimatum: “You bring a gun into the District, you mark my words, you’re going to jail. I don’t care if you have a license in another district and I don’t care if you’re a law-abiding gun owner somewhere else.” Her comments come amid heightened tensions around gun control in the wake of the controversial death of Alex Pretti, a licensed gun owner who was shot by immigration enforcement agents last month.
Pirro’s remarks have drawn sharp criticism from Republican lawmakers and conservative media figures, with one congressman provocatively responding, “Come and Take it!” The sentiment among many in the GOP reflects a growing discontent with the shifting rhetoric surrounding gun rights, particularly from within the Trump administration.
The Fallout from Pirro’s Remarks
Pirro’s comments have only intensified the existing frustrations of gun rights groups. Following Donald Trump’s own contentious remarks about the Pretti case, which suggested that Pretti should not have been armed, gun advocates are now feeling cornered. The National Association for Gun Rights labelled Pirro’s statement as “unacceptable and intolerable,” asserting that it illustrates the urgent need for what they term “Real Constitutional Carry” across the nation.
Moreover, conservative figures have expressed outrage over what they perceive as an alarming shift towards anti-gun sentiment within the GOP. “Jeanine Pirro threatening to arrest people for carrying in D.C., even if they are law-abiding and licensed, shows how broken and out of touch these gun laws are,” said a spokesperson from the National Association for Gun Rights.
A Changing Landscape for Gun Rights
Compounding the discord, Pirro’s stance arrives at a time when the Trump administration appears to be recalibrating its approach to gun control. The president’s previous claims of having the “most pro-Second Amendment administration in history” now seem at odds with the hardline positions emerging from his circle.
During her discussion with host Martha MacCallum, Pirro pointed to a significant drop in violent crime in Washington, attributing it to aggressive gun seizures by law enforcement. “Since the search happened, there have been 9,500 arrests and almost 1,000 guns taken off the street,” she claimed, framing her position as part of a broader public safety strategy. However, her assertion that this policy should extend to lawful gun owners travelling to D.C. has left many in the Republican base feeling betrayed and disenfranchised.
The Response from the Right
The backlash against Pirro’s comments has been swift. Prominent conservatives, including Rep. Thomas Massie, have spoken out against her approach, noting that D.C. has been a “shall issue” jurisdiction since 2017, allowing non-residents to apply for concealed carry permits. Meanwhile, Rep. Greg Steube, also a gun rights advocate, shared that he regularly brings his firearm into the district, underscoring the disconnect between Pirro’s statements and the realities of gun laws.
Even among her allies, there is discontent. Former Fox News colleague Eric Bolling expressed outrage over Pirro’s desire to tighten already stringent gun laws, while conservative commentators like Erick Erickson warned that the GOP leadership risks alienating Second Amendment voters ahead of the midterms.
Why it Matters
Jeanine Pirro’s remarks reflect a significant fracture within the Republican Party over gun rights, a divisive issue that could prove pivotal in upcoming elections. As tensions mount, the response from within the party may signal a broader ideological shift, challenging the traditional principles of the GOP and raising questions about the future of Second Amendment rights in America. As more voices join the fray, the implications for voters and lawmakers alike may resonate far beyond the confines of D.C., echoing throughout the nation as debates over personal freedoms and public safety continue to intensify.
