**
In a stark examination of contemporary governance, war correspondent Janine di Giovanni draws unsettling parallels between the tactics of democratic nations and those of authoritarian regimes. In her latest commentary, she argues that the United States and Israel are increasingly adopting methods reminiscent of the very governments they once denounced, raising alarms about the implications for civil liberties and human rights.
A Historical Context of State Terror
Di Giovanni’s insights are rooted in a wealth of experience documenting state violence across the globe. From her time in Syria under Bashar al-Assad, where victims would vanish into the night, to the brutalities faced by dissenters in Iraq, she has witnessed the chilling effects of state-sponsored terror. The memories of those who suffered—individuals whose lives were irrevocably altered by government actions—serve as cautionary tales against the normalisation of fear and violence within societies.
The author recounts harrowing instances of state terror, such as the abduction and murder of Italian scholar Giulio Regeni in Egypt, and the assassination of journalist Anna Politkovskaya in Russia. Each case underscores a grim reality: when governments resort to violence to suppress dissent, the moral fabric of society begins to fray.
The Language of Control
Central to Di Giovanni’s argument is the manipulation of language employed by governments to justify their actions. Terms like “security” and “order” are manipulated to legitimise increasingly aggressive policies. In Israel, operations in Gaza are framed exclusively through the lens of security, while in the United States, the tactics of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) reflect a similar mindset—one that prioritises control over compassion.
The author warns that this rhetoric serves to create a culture of compliance, where citizens are conditioned to accept harsh measures under the guise of safety. Drawing on the work of historian Timothy Snyder, she highlights how democracies can slip into tyranny as people begin to self-censor, internalising fear and limiting their own freedoms.
The Normalisation of Fear
Di Giovanni observes a concerning trend in which fear has become institutionalised in both the US and Israel. The targeting of journalists, academics, and activists reflects a broader strategy to suppress dissent. Universities have begun surveilling students involved in pro-Palestinian protests, while those who resist are increasingly branded as enemies of the state.
The chilling reality is that these tactics are not new; ICE has long employed aggressive methods against vulnerable communities. However, the growing acceptance of these practices marks a significant shift in public consciousness—one that risks eroding the very foundations of democracy.
The Global Implications
As democracies emulate the oppressive tactics of authoritarian regimes, their international standing is jeopardised. The erosion of civil liberties not only undermines societal trust but also diminishes the legitimacy that separates democratic nations from their tyrannical counterparts. Di Giovanni’s observations serve as a stark reminder of the fragility of freedom and the need for vigilance against the creeping influence of state terror.
Why it Matters
The implications of di Giovanni’s analysis extend beyond borders. As the US and Israel adopt increasingly authoritarian measures, the global community must remain vigilant. The normalisation of state terror threatens not only the rights of individuals within these nations but also the very principles of democracy on which they were founded. Recognising these patterns and responding with urgency is essential to preserving the freedoms that define democratic societies. The voices of those who have lived through state terror must be amplified, serving as a crucial warning against complacency and the erosion of human rights.