**
In a striking parallel to past interventions, former President Donald Trump has urged the Iranian populace to rise against their government, reminiscent of a pivotal moment in 1991 when President George H.W. Bush issued a similar call to the Iraqi people. While the world watches closely, the lessons learned from that era loom large, raising concerns about the lack of subsequent support and the unintended consequences that may follow.
Historical Context: The 1991 Precedent
On 15 February 1991, President George H.W. Bush delivered a speech at a factory in Massachusetts, lauding the capabilities of the newly deployed Patriot missile systems during the Gulf War. The military campaign aimed to liberate Kuwait from Iraqi forces, with coalition airstrikes intensifying as troops amassed on the borders. In a moment that would haunt him, Bush proclaimed that the Iraqi military and people should take matters into their own hands to oust Saddam Hussein.
At the time, I was reporting from Baghdad, where the devastation of coalition airstrikes was palpable. The aftermath of Bush’s encouragement became evident as Shia and Kurdish factions in Iraq attempted to rise against Hussein’s regime, believing they had tacit support from the United States. However, once the military action subsided, the U.S. and its allies watched without intervening as Hussein crushed the uprisings, leading to catastrophic consequences for those who heeded Bush’s call.
Trump and Netanyahu’s Current Appeal
Fast forward to today, and Trump, alongside Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has issued a clarion call for Iranians to overthrow their government, suggesting they are being offered a rare opportunity for liberation. However, like Bush’s remarks, these declarations come without a clear commitment to provide military or moral support to those who might take action against the Iranian regime.
Netanyahu has articulated his long-standing ambition to dismantle Iran’s influence in the region, framing the current military campaign as a chance to eradicate what he terms the “terror regime.” His rhetoric suggests that Israel is not just passively observing but actively seeking to capitalise on the chaos that may ensue should an uprising materialise.
The Risks of U.S. Intervention
The U.S. Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth, has publicly dismissed concerns regarding the moral implications of military action without UN backing, arguing that the potential long-term benefits outweigh short-term costs. However, this sentiment is fraught with danger, as historical precedents illustrate the complexities and potential for catastrophic fallout resulting from regime change without a robust plan for what follows.
The devastation unleashed in Iraq after U.S. forces ousted Hussein serves as a stark reminder of the unpredictability of such interventions. The power vacuum left in Iraq led to years of violence, sectarian strife, and the emergence of extremist groups, including ISIS. There is a palpable fear that a similar scenario could unfold in Iran, exacerbating regional instability and potentially drawing in other global powers.
The Broader Implications for Regional Stability
As tensions escalate, the implications stretch beyond Iran and Iraq. The potential for conflict to disrupt alliances between the U.S. and Gulf nations is significant, as these countries reassess their positions amidst a shifting geopolitical landscape. Additionally, the prospect of a prolonged military engagement raises questions about America’s capability and willingness to manage its commitments, particularly in light of rising competition with China.
Israel, sensing an opportunity, appears poised to pursue its objectives aggressively. The current focus on Iran may also allow Israel to further its ambitions regarding the West Bank, as it seeks to reshape the regional order to its advantage.
Why it Matters
The unfolding events surrounding Trump’s and Netanyahu’s calls for an uprising in Iran serve as a critical juncture not just for Iran, but for the entire Middle East. History teaches us that calls for revolution must be paired with actionable support to prevent tragic outcomes. As the U.S. finds itself embroiled in yet another complex military engagement, the lessons of the past remind us that the road to conflict is laden with unforeseen consequences. Without a clear strategy, the current actions risk igniting a cycle of violence that could destabilise the region for years to come.
