**
In a rapidly evolving conflict that has seen US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launch a military offensive against Iran, historical lessons about warfare appear to be disregarded. Both leaders now face a critical juncture: whether to declare an illusory victory or escalate the situation further. As the airstrikes continue, the implications of their decisions could reverberate far beyond the Middle East.
Historical Lessons Ignored
The current conflict’s trajectory underscores a fundamental truth articulated by Prussian military strategist Helmuth von Moltke the Elder: “No plan survives first contact with the enemy.” This wisdom, penned in 1871, resonates deeply today as Trump grapples with the unexpected resilience of Iran’s regime. Initially, Trump seemed to anticipate a swift victory akin to the US’s quick capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro earlier this year. However, the stark differences between Venezuela and Iran’s geopolitical landscapes are becoming increasingly apparent.
Dwight D. Eisenhower also imparted wisdom on the unpredictability of warfare, asserting that while “plans are worthless, planning is everything.” This notion emphasises the importance of adaptability in military strategy—something that appears to be lacking in Trump’s current approach. As the situation unfolds, Iran’s response to the airstrikes, including the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has been one of unexpected resilience rather than capitulation.
The Resilience of Iran
The Iranian regime has demonstrated a remarkable capacity for endurance and strategic planning amidst adversity. Rather than crumbling under the weight of escalating violence, Tehran has effectively coordinated responses, including attacks on US bases and regional allies. This calculated approach highlights a significant miscalculation on the part of Trump and Netanyahu, who anticipated a popular uprising against the Iranian government in the wake of military action.
Iran’s historical context—a regime built on strong institutional foundations following the 1979 revolution—has fortified its resolve. The Iranian leadership remains aware that any uprising against the regime could be met with brutal repression, as evidenced by the government’s response to protests earlier this year. The regime’s ideology, deeply rooted in religious conviction and a narrative of martyrdom, serves to further entrench its power despite significant losses.
Divergent Strategies: Trump vs. Netanyahu
In stark contrast to Trump’s instinctive decision-making style, Netanyahu has approached the conflict with a methodical clarity. His longstanding focus on Iran as an existential threat to Israel has shaped Israel’s military strategy, which seeks to inflict maximum damage on Iranian capabilities. In a recent video statement, Netanyahu outlined his war aims with precision, seeking to undermine Iran’s military infrastructure and secure Israel’s future.
This clarity is crucial, given that the regional stakes differ significantly from the broader global implications faced by the US. For Netanyahu, the war is about ensuring Israel’s survival, while Trump appears to be navigating an increasingly complex landscape without a comprehensive plan.
The Consequences of Inaction
As the conflict continues, the risk of further escalation looms large. Trump’s recent postponements of retaliatory threats suggest a recognition of the delicate balance required in this situation. Should he choose to declare victory prematurely, it could destabilise global financial markets and alienate US allies, particularly in Europe and the Gulf region. Conversely, further military escalation could lead to a protracted conflict that neither side appears prepared to manage effectively.
The potential for regional destabilisation is exacerbated by Iran’s strategic control over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil supplies. Any attempts to capture Iranian territory could draw the US into a drawn-out conflict, potentially matching Iran’s capacity for prolonged warfare.
Why it Matters
As the conflict between the US and Iran unfolds, the implications extend well beyond the immediate region. A poorly conceived military strategy could not only jeopardise US interests in the Middle East but also reshape global power dynamics, especially in light of rising tensions with China. Should this conflict spiral out of control, it may serve as a pivotal moment in history, reflecting a decline in US influence similar to the consequences faced by Britain following the Suez Crisis. The choices made by Trump and Netanyahu in the coming weeks will be instrumental in determining the future stability of the region and the world at large.
