**
The United States has completed its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO), marking a significant shift in its long-standing involvement with the global health agency. This decision, originally announced by former President Donald Trump one year ago, has raised concerns about the potential ramifications for international public health efforts. The U.S. owes approximately $280 million to the WHO, and experts warn that this departure could hinder the global response to future health crises and limit access to vital data for American scientists.
## The Disruption of Global Health Initiatives
The WHO, established as the United Nations’ primary health agency, plays a crucial role in coordinating responses to worldwide health threats such as outbreaks of diseases like Ebola, polio, and more recently, COVID-19. It also provides essential technical support to lower-income countries, facilitates the distribution of vaccines and medical supplies, and sets health guidelines across numerous conditions. Historically, the U.S. has been one of the WHO’s largest contributors, both in terms of financial support and personnel expertise.
According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, America typically contributes around $111 million annually in membership dues, along with approximately $570 million in voluntary donations. Trump’s decision to terminate U.S. membership was framed as a response to perceived failings in the WHO’s management of the COVID-19 pandemic and other health emergencies. He argued that the organisation had not demonstrated necessary reforms and was overly influenced by its member states.
## Implications for Public Health Research
Public health experts are expressing serious concerns regarding the impact of this withdrawal on U.S. scientific research and global health initiatives. Lawrence Gostin, a distinguished public health law expert at Georgetown University, described the decision as “the most ruinous presidential decision in my lifetime”. The exit means that U.S. scientists will no longer participate in WHO-led committees and working groups, which are essential for monitoring and responding to global health threats, including influenza strains and other communicable diseases.
Dr. Ronald Nahass, president of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, characterised the move as “shortsighted and misguided,” asserting that the U.S. would miss valuable opportunities to collaborate on health challenges that transcend borders. The withdrawal could severely undermine efforts to eradicate diseases such as polio and diminish maternal and child health programmes, as well as research into emerging viral threats.
## Challenges Ahead for U.S. Health Security
With the U.S. stepping back from WHO, officials have indicated they will seek to establish direct health relationships with other countries. However, specific details regarding these arrangements remain vague, raising questions about their effectiveness. Experts like Gostin warn that it is improbable the U.S. will secure agreements with many nations, especially considering the current geopolitical climate.
The lack of collaboration with WHO means that the U.S. might miss out on critical disease intelligence, which has historically allowed Americans to access vaccines and treatments swiftly during outbreaks. This intelligence-sharing has been pivotal in ensuring that the U.S. remains at the forefront of responding to infectious disease threats.
Moreover, questions have arisen about the legality of the withdrawal itself. Critics argue that the U.S. joined the WHO via an act of Congress, suggesting that a similar legislative process should be followed for withdrawal. While the U.S. gave notice of its departure in accordance with WHO regulations, it has not settled its outstanding financial obligations, further complicating its exit.
## Why it Matters
The U.S. withdrawal from the WHO signifies more than just a shift in international relations; it represents a critical juncture in global health cooperation. As infectious diseases continue to pose significant risks to populations worldwide, collaboration and data sharing are more essential than ever. The consequences of this decision could be felt for years to come, impacting not only the U.S. but also the health security of communities across the globe. Without active participation in global health initiatives, the U.S. risks hampering its own ability to respond to future health emergencies, ultimately putting lives at stake.
