**
A whistleblower complaint against Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, has emerged as a contentious issue, described as so sensitive that its details remain locked away and undisclosed to Congress. Allegations have surfaced suggesting that Gabbard may have obstructed the complaint’s progression, casting a shadow over her leadership in the intelligence community.
Highly Classified Allegations
According to a report from The Wall Street Journal, the complaint was filed in May 2025 and has since sparked an ongoing struggle regarding its assessment and handling. Officials are reportedly concerned that revealing the complaint’s details could significantly jeopardise national security. Andrew Bakaj, the whistleblower’s attorney, has accused Gabbard’s office of deliberately delaying the complaint’s submission to lawmakers, a claim her representatives have strongly denied.
The complaint has been described as involving another federal agency and possibly implicating executive privilege, hinting at potential White House involvement. Bakaj’s letter, which was sent to Gabbard in November 2025, highlights that her office has not provided necessary security guidance for transmitting the complaint to congressional intelligence committees—an unusual and troubling delay.
Congressional Response
The timeline of the complaint’s handling raises eyebrows. Normally, the inspector general is expected to determine the credibility of a complaint within two weeks and share it with Congress within another week if it is found credible. However, in this case, it has remained under wraps for over six months. Members of Congress were only made aware of the situation when Bakaj’s letter was shared in November, prompting inquiries from Democratic staffers eager to understand its implications.
The complaint’s classified nature has prevented even Bakaj from reviewing its contents, although Gabbard’s office has labelled the allegations as politically charged and unfounded. A spokesperson for Gabbard asserted that she has taken steps to facilitate the eventual sharing of information with Congress and has cooperated with the inspector general’s office.
Gabbard’s Controversial Actions
Gabbard, who oversees the U.S. intelligence community, finds herself under scrutiny not only for the whistleblower complaint but also for her personal involvement in a recent FBI operation. She attended a search at an election centre office in Fulton County, Georgia, raising questions about her role and appropriateness in such investigations. Senator Jon Ossoff, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, expressed concern during a recent hearing, indicating that Gabbard’s actions might be perceived as overstepping her authority.
Ossoff stated, “The American public is rightfully alarmed and asking questions,” referring to Gabbard’s presence at the FBI evidence truck. He called for a bipartisan investigation to ascertain whether Gabbard is indeed “straying far outside of [her] lane.”
The Bigger Picture
This incident is not an isolated one. In recent years, the inspector general has received a number of urgent concern complaints, with many requiring special handling due to their sensitive nature. The current complaint against Gabbard stands out due to its classified status and the potential implications it holds for U.S. national security.
Bakaj, who has extensive experience with whistleblower procedures, previously represented a CIA officer whose complaint led to the first impeachment of former President Donald Trump. His involvement in the current situation adds another layer of complexity and urgency.
Why it Matters
The unfolding situation surrounding Tulsi Gabbard and the whistleblower complaint highlights significant concerns regarding transparency and oversight within the U.S. intelligence community. As the nation grapples with pressing national security issues, the handling of this complaint could set a precedent for how such allegations are addressed in the future. The implications stretch far beyond Gabbard’s office, affecting public trust in governmental institutions and their accountability mechanisms. With a divided Congress and heightened scrutiny of executive actions, the resolution of this matter could influence future policymaking and the integrity of intelligence operations in the United States.
