In a poignant plea for justice, descendants of Zimbabwe’s early resistance leaders have formally approached the Natural History Museum and the University of Cambridge, urging both institutions to assist in locating the remains of their ancestors. These individuals, who fought valiantly against British colonial rule in the late 19th century, are believed to have had their skulls taken to the UK, and their descendants are determined to reclaim their heritage.
Historical Context of the First Chimurenga
The first chimurenga, or uprising, in the 1890s saw a fierce resistance against British imperial forces in Zimbabwe. Figures such as Chief Chingaira Makoni and spirit mediums Mbuya Nehanda and Sekuru Kaguvi played pivotal roles in this struggle. Unfortunately, many of these leaders faced brutal repression, with their remains believed to have been appropriated during the colonial era.
According to the descendants, the Natural History Museum possesses approximately 3,375 items of human remains from Africa, the second largest collection in the UK after the University of Cambridge, which holds at least 6,223. The recent revelation of these collections has sparked outrage and disbelief, particularly given the lack of clarity from both institutions concerning the provenance of these remains.
A Call for Collaboration and Accountability
In letters dispatched this month, the descendants have requested that both the Natural History Museum and the University of Cambridge engage in a collaborative effort to trace the remains of six specific ancestors. They have also offered to provide DNA samples to enhance the investigative process. “This is not only about the past,” the letters assert. “It is about whether institutions today are willing to confront colonial violence honestly and repair its enduring harms.”

Cogen Simbayi Gwasira, a direct descendant of Chief Makoni, articulated the emotional weight of this issue. “We feel that the British, and especially the museums in England, should be honest and return those things that they took,” he stated. Gwasira emphasised that reconnecting with these ancestral remains is vital for healing and closure for his community.
Institutional Responses and Ongoing Concerns
Despite the overwhelming desire for reconciliation, both the Natural History Museum and the University of Cambridge have maintained that they have not identified any remains belonging to the chimurenga heroes. This assertion has only deepened the sense of frustration among descendants and Zimbabwean officials alike. The museum’s trustees had announced plans in 2022 to repatriate all human remains from Zimbabwe in their possession; however, a recent letter from a parliamentary group highlighted a lack of tangible progress in this endeavour.
Dr Rudo Sithole, an expert in African museum practices, expressed concern that insufficient research has been conducted to ascertain whether any remains held in the UK are indeed those of the freedom fighters. “Because people long believed that all the chimurenga heroes’ remains were in the UK, we are now very worried that not even a single one has been acknowledged to be there,” she remarked.
The Spiritual Significance of Ancestral Remains
The cultural implications of these remains extend far beyond the physical. In Zimbabwean Shona tradition, ancestral spirits, or vadzimu, serve as intermediaries between the living and the divine. Gwasira explained, “Some of our very important ancestors who held the traditional responsibility for taking our grievances to the Lord were killed, murdered, their heads were taken.” The absence of these remains has profound spiritual ramifications, as many believe their connection to the divine is hindered until their ancestors are returned to them.

Why it Matters
The quest for the return of these ancestral remains is not merely a matter of historical restitution; it is emblematic of the broader struggle for recognition, justice, and healing from the wounds inflicted by colonialism. The efforts of the descendants highlight the importance of accountability from institutions that house colonial relics and underscore the need for a more inclusive narrative that acknowledges the complexities of history. As discussions around repatriation gain momentum, the response of UK institutions will be pivotal in shaping the future of cultural heritage and reconciliation within the context of post-colonial relationships.