The federal government and Alberta are on the cusp of finalising a significant new agreement regarding industrial carbon pricing, which could see the levy rise to $130 per tonne by 2040. This potential accord, as revealed by two sources from both levels of government, marks a substantial pivot from former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s ambitious climate framework and opens the door for further oil production, including the construction of a new pipeline to British Columbia’s coast.
New Framework for Carbon Pricing
Discussions surrounding the carbon pricing framework have been complicated by disagreements over the pace at which Alberta should elevate its carbon price from the current $95 to the proposed $130. Prime Minister Mark Carney is slated to present the plan during a cabinet meeting on Wednesday, with expectations that he will travel to Alberta later this week to publicly announce the agreement.
During a meeting in Ottawa on May 8, Carney and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith delved into the timeline concerning the carbon price increase, which has emerged as a focal point of their negotiations. A spokesperson for Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson has indicated that the federal government would refrain from commenting on the evolving situation.
A Shift from Previous Commitments
Under the previous Liberal administration, industrial carbon pricing was a cornerstone of Canada’s approach to climate change, underpinning ambitious emission reduction targets. However, should the cabinet endorse the new arrangement with Alberta, the carbon price would fall significantly short of the former target of $170 per tonne by 2030. Critics, including those from the Canadian Climate Institute, argue that this revised target would yield minimal emissions reductions in heavy industry, particularly as the timeline extends to 2040.

The urgency for an agreement has intensified in light of Alberta’s looming referendum on secession, driven by grievances over federal policies perceived to hinder the province’s energy sector. Carney has pointed to the memorandum of understanding established last year as a framework for improved relations between federal and provincial authorities, suggesting that cooperation is essential for both parties.
Potential Pipeline Developments
Amidst these discussions, Alberta is preparing to submit an application for a new pipeline to Ottawa’s Major Projects Office by July 1, although the specifics regarding the consortium of companies involved remain unclear. The province has consistently argued that the proposal will involve a “world-class Indigenous co-owned pipeline” destined for the West Coast of British Columbia.
Recent federal proposals aim to streamline the pipeline approval process, allowing cabinet to greenlight projects before completing technical assessments. This approach is intended to bolster investor confidence, with the federal government poised to declare the pipeline as a project of national importance. The provincial government is reportedly considering multiple routes for the pipeline, focusing on potential northern and southern paths.
Environmental and Economic Implications
As negotiations progress, environmental considerations remain a contentious issue. The southern route, which could parallel the Trans Mountain pipeline, is believed to face fewer ecological obstacles than the northern route proposed by Alberta. However, Premier Smith has indicated that several options are still under evaluation, with five potential routes being considered.

A major unresolved aspect of the negotiations is a substantial carbon capture initiative, known as Pathways, proposed by six leading oil companies in Alberta. Officials have suggested that once the carbon pricing timelines are finalised, this multibillion-dollar project could become feasible. Smith has underscored the importance of Pathways in facilitating increased oil production and achieving broader climate objectives.
Why it Matters
The impending agreement on carbon pricing and the potential for a new pipeline to the West Coast represent a pivotal moment for Canada’s energy policy and climate strategy. By recalibrating the carbon price and advancing pipeline projects, the federal government and Alberta are attempting to balance economic interests with environmental responsibilities. However, the implications of these decisions could resonate far beyond provincial borders, influencing Canada’s overall commitment to climate change and its role in the global energy landscape. As the nation grapples with these complex issues, the outcomes will undoubtedly shape the future trajectory of Canada’s environmental policies and its energy sector’s sustainability.