**
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s distinctive communication style has transformed the political lexicon in Canada, with terms like “tranche” and “catalysing” now commonplace in everyday dialogue. However, no phrase has gained as much traction as “memorandum of understanding” (MOU). This term, once confined to the realms of business and legal jargon, has become a hallmark of Carney’s administration, signalling a commitment to tangible outcomes and collaborative governance.
MOUs: More Than Just Paperwork
In recent weeks, the Carney government has put MOUs at the forefront of its strategy to navigate complex intergovernmental relationships and economic development. A notable example was the $20 billion MOU between the federal government and British Columbia, aimed at easing tensions over pipeline projects. The agreement was arguably a strategic move to align provincial and federal interests, particularly in light of the controversial Alberta pipeline agreement that had previously drawn scrutiny.
During his recent international engagements, Carney signed multiple MOUs—including two with the President of the Philippines to enhance tourism and cultural ties, and a staggering 13 agreements in Saudi Arabia, collectively valued at over $1 billion. These MOUs cover diverse sectors, from health technology to defence, demonstrating a broad scope of governmental ambition.
Understanding the Function of MOUs
MOUs serve as formal acknowledgments of mutual goals between parties, often laying the groundwork for more binding agreements in the future. Jeremy Barretto, a regulatory partner at Torys LLP, describes them as the preliminary step in confirming the intentions of involved parties. Typically succinct and non-binding, they facilitate discussions and negotiations without the burdensome legal formalities associated with traditional contracts.
Barretto emphasises that while MOUs may lack the enforceability of contracts, they are far from superficial. They represent a commitment to collaborative action and a shared vision, particularly crucial in the context of federal-provincial relations where alignment on policies—especially regarding climate and resource management—has historically been fraught with challenges.
The Political Landscape and MOUs
Former Privy Council clerk Michael Wernick categorises these recent MOUs as alignment exercises, which help to bring different levels of government into agreement on contentious issues. He notes that the Alberta and B.C. agreements illustrate a significant shift in the political landscape: the Alberta government and the oil sector have accepted the improbability of a pipeline to northwest B.C., while B.C. Premier David Eby has acknowledged the ongoing reality of oil traffic at southern terminals.
This recalibration of perspectives is indicative of a broader trend in Canadian federalism, where provinces vie for attention and resources. Wernick suggests that Carney’s MOUs could ignite similar demands from other provinces seeking their share of federal support, characterising this as a natural aspect of federal governance.
The Road Ahead: Implementation and Accountability
While MOUs represent a step forward in negotiations, they are merely the starting point in a long and intricate process of policy implementation. Wernick warns that 2026 may emerge as a pivotal year for negotiations and deal-making, with the real test lying in the government’s ability to follow through on the commitments outlined in these agreements.
The challenge will be to translate the high ambitions encapsulated in MOUs into concrete actions and measurable outcomes. As Carney’s administration continues to navigate these complexities, the effectiveness of MOUs will be scrutinised not only for their content but for their tangible impact on Canadian society.
Why it Matters
The rise of MOUs within the Carney government reflects a significant shift in how political agreements are framed and executed in Canada. By promoting collaborative frameworks, the Prime Minister is attempting to foster a cooperative atmosphere among provinces and the federal government, crucial for tackling pressing national issues. However, the true efficacy of these agreements will be tested in the coming years, as citizens and stakeholders alike demand accountability and results from the ambitious strategies laid out in these memoranda. The success or failure of this approach could redefine the landscape of Canadian governance for years to come.