**
Prime Minister Mark Carney’s administration has introduced a novel approach to governance, heavily utilising memoranda of understanding (MOUs) as a primary tool for shaping policy and fostering collaboration. This strategy, which emerged prominently over the past 18 months, is increasingly influencing the political landscape, particularly in the context of significant projects such as the controversial Alberta-to-British Columbia pipeline.
The Rise of MOUs in Canadian Politics
Since taking office, Carney has transformed the language of governance, integrating terminology from his banking background into the political discourse. Terms like “tranche” have become commonplace, reflecting a shift towards a more corporate-style communication framework. However, none of these terms have gained as much traction as “memorandum of understanding.”
Historically, MOUs were used sporadically by previous administrations, but under Carney, they have become foundational to the government’s operational strategy. Recently, the federal government and British Columbia announced a $20-billion MOU aimed at easing tensions surrounding the Alberta pipeline initiative, a move that underscores the importance of these agreements in fostering intergovernmental cooperation.
Understanding MOUs: More Than Just Paperwork
At their core, MOUs serve as preliminary agreements that establish mutual intentions between parties before they embark on complex projects. Jeremy Barretto, a Calgary-based regulatory partner at Torys LLP, describes MOUs as non-binding documents that articulate shared goals while providing a framework for collaboration.
Barretto emphasises that while MOUs may lack the enforceability of formal contracts, they are significant in public policy discussions. They allow governments to align on various issues—from environmental regulations to economic development—without the lengthy processes typically required for binding agreements.
In a landscape where cooperation between provincial and federal governments has often been fraught, especially in Western Canada, MOUs can act as a bridge. They lay the groundwork for future negotiations and offer a clearer path to achieving collective objectives.
The Political Implications of MOUs
Michael Wernick, former clerk of the Privy Council under Justin Trudeau, has noted that MOUs are essentially a rebranding of agreements that have always existed in Canadian governance. He refers to the recent Alberta and B.C. MOUs as “alignment exercises,” indicating their role in creating a unified direction among disparate interests.
Wernick highlights that these agreements also reveal the underlying tensions in Canadian energy policy. The Alberta government and the oil sector have, in a tacit acknowledgment, accepted that a pipeline to northwest British Columbia is no longer viable. Conversely, B.C. Premier David Eby has adjusted his stance, recognising the inevitability of oil traffic through southern terminals.
With Carney’s MOU strategy, there is a risk that other provinces may seek similar arrangements, potentially creating a cascade of demands for federal support. Wernick suggests that this is simply a function of federalism, where the government must navigate multiple interests across the country.
The Future of MOUs and Canadian Governance
As we look ahead, the real challenge lies not just in the signing of these MOUs but in their implementation. Wernick warns that 2026 may emerge as a pivotal year for negotiations and deal-making, setting the stage for the realisation of these strategic agreements.
The effectiveness of Carney’s approach will ultimately depend on whether his government can translate these initial agreements into tangible outcomes. The public will be watching closely to see if these MOUs lead to meaningful progress in addressing the complex issues facing Canada today.
Why it Matters
The increasing prominence of MOUs in Canadian governance marks a significant shift in how the federal government engages with provinces and other stakeholders. By prioritising these agreements, Carney’s administration is not only redefining political communication but also reshaping the landscape of Canadian policy-making. As the nation grapples with pressing issues like energy development and intergovernmental relations, the efficacy of these MOUs will be crucial in determining the success of collaborative governance and the future trajectory of Canada’s economic and environmental policies.