**
In a notable shift in the narrative of Canadian governance, Prime Minister Mark Carney has introduced a distinctive communication style that has permeated both the political and public lexicon. With a series of recent memorandums of understanding (MOUs), Carney’s administration is reshaping the dialogue around governmental agreements, particularly in the realms of energy and inter-provincial relations. These MOUs are not mere formalities; they represent a strategic approach to foster collaboration and align objectives across various levels of government.
The Rise of the MOU
Since assuming office, Carney has infused his administration with terms and concepts from his extensive background in finance. The MOU, once a niche term buried in legal and business jargon, has become a hallmark of his government’s strategy. It signifies a commitment to getting things accomplished, as evidenced by the recent $20 billion MOU between the federal government and British Columbia, aimed at addressing concerns surrounding the Alberta pipeline agreement.
The Prime Minister’s engagements have extended beyond domestic borders, as seen in his recent trip to Saudi Arabia, where he secured 13 commercial agreements and MOUs valued at over $1 billion, covering sectors such as health technology, mining, infrastructure, and defence. These efforts highlight Carney’s focus on international collaboration while simultaneously addressing domestic issues.
Understanding the MOU’s Role
At its core, a memorandum of understanding serves as a preliminary framework for cooperation between parties. Jeremy Barretto, a regulatory partner at Torys LLP, describes MOUs as a means to articulate mutual intentions, often resulting in frameworks that facilitate further contractual agreements. While typically non-binding, they provide a structured approach to ensure that all parties are aligned on overarching goals before embarking on complex projects.
Barretto notes that in the public sector, particularly in federal-provincial contexts, MOUs can pave the way for greater cooperation on significant issues such as project development and regulatory frameworks. They are particularly valuable when navigating the often murky waters of intergovernmental relations, where historical misalignments on policies related to climate and energy have created friction.
The Political Implications of MOUs
Former Clerk of the Privy Council Michael Wernick emphasises that the Carney government’s use of the term “memorandum of understanding” encapsulates the essence of agreements that have long existed between various governmental entities. He characterises the recent MOUs between Alberta and British Columbia as significant alignment exercises, enabling both the federal and provincial governments to move forward in a coordinated manner.
Yet, the underlying reality remains complex. Wernick points out that these agreements reflect a broader acceptance of the current limitations regarding pipeline developments, particularly in British Columbia. Both the Alberta government and the oil and gas sector have finally acknowledged that the prospect of a pipeline to northwest B.C. is no longer viable, a concession that marks a turning point in regional energy policy.
A New Era of Federalism
As Carney continues to navigate this intricate political landscape, questions arise about the implications of his MOU-centric approach. Will other provinces seek similar agreements to address their concerns? This is a natural aspect of federalism, as Wernick suggests, where the federal government must balance the interests of diverse regions.
However, the challenge remains: these MOUs are merely starting points for longer-term negotiations and implementations. Wernick predicts that 2026 could become a watershed year for negotiations and deal-making, with the real test lying in the government’s ability to fulfil the commitments outlined in these agreements.
Why it Matters
The transition toward utilising MOUs as a central element of governance under Carney’s leadership signifies a fundamental shift in how intergovernmental relations are conducted in Canada. These agreements not only reflect a commitment to collaboration but also serve as a tangible measure of progress in a historically fragmented political landscape. As the nation grapples with complex issues surrounding energy, climate policy, and provincial relations, the effectiveness of these MOUs will be crucial in determining whether Carney’s government can achieve its ambitious objectives and foster a more unified approach to governance across the country.