**
In a decisive move that solidifies his administration’s approach to the Senate, Prime Minister Mark Carney has ruled out the possibility of Liberal senators rejoining the party’s caucus. This announcement, confirmed by a senior government official, puts an end to ongoing speculation about how Carney would navigate the complexities of the Upper Chamber, particularly following his predecessor Justin Trudeau’s controversial expulsion of senators in 2014 amid the Senate expense scandal.
Senate Dynamics Under Carney
Since taking office last spring, Carney has yet to make any Senate appointments, raising questions about his intentions regarding the advisory panel established by Trudeau for recommending Senate candidates. The advisory board was designed to mitigate partisanship within the Senate, but criticism has persisted, especially from Conservative quarters, who argue it has failed to achieve its objective.
A senior government source, who chose to remain anonymous due to the sensitivity of the information, indicated that Carney aims to maintain the status quo regarding the Liberal caucus. This clarification comes after Carney confirmed his intention to continue utilising the existing advisory board while remaining ambiguous about the integration of new appointees into the caucus.
Current Senate Landscape
The Senate currently faces a significant number of vacancies, with nine of its 105 seats unfilled and an additional six senators expected to retire by 2026. The Independent Advisory Board for Senate Appointments is grappling with its own shortages, operating with just five active members and 24 vacancies, while not accepting new applications for Senate positions. The Privy Council Office has not provided a timeline for when these appointments might begin, with spokesperson Pierre-Alain Bujold stating that details would be made available “in due course.”
In the aftermath of Trudeau’s decision to expel Liberal senators, the Upper Chamber has seen the emergence of distinct factions. The Conservatives remain represented, while the remainder of the Senate is divided among the Independent Senators Group, the Canadian Senators Group, and the Progressive Senate Group, alongside unaffiliated senators and those associated with the Government Representative’s Office.
The Sentiment in the Senate
Despite Carney’s lack of formal announcements, there is a prevailing sentiment among senators that reflects his decision, as noted by Senator Rodger Cuzner, a former Liberal MP appointed in 2023. “I’m not sensing a strong desire among senators to return to the federal caucus,” he remarked, implying a certain contentment with the current arrangements. Another senator, Percy Downe, underscored the futility of the debate, stating, “You can’t go where you’re not invited,” emphasising the lack of interest in rejoining the Liberal fold.
Downe, one of the few remaining senators expelled from the Liberal caucus and an advocate for the necessity of an official opposition in the Senate, indicated that while some senators may wish to be part of the Liberal caucus, they are finding alternative ways to influence policy. He noted that legislation has been advancing smoothly under the present framework, primarily because most senators appointed through the advisory board align with Liberal principles.
Calls for Conservative Representation
Last month, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre urged Carney to appoint Conservative senators, arguing that the Senate should reflect the electoral outcome of the last general election, where 41 per cent of the vote went to the Conservatives. Downe echoed this sentiment, asserting that the Senate’s efficacy is hampered without an official opposition, as it risks becoming an “echo chamber” devoid of diverse perspectives.
Why it Matters
Carney’s decision not to reintegrate Liberal senators into the caucus is emblematic of a broader strategy to maintain a certain distance from partisan politics within the Senate. As the Upper Chamber continues to evolve with its current factions and the absence of a robust opposition, the implications for legislative effectiveness and democratic representation grow increasingly significant. The Prime Minister’s approach will likely set the tone for not just the functioning of the Senate, but also for the relationship between the government and the Upper Chamber moving forward.
