**
Former FBI Director James Comey has raised serious allegations against federal prosecutors, asserting that they sanctioned unlawful electronic surveillance and leveraged the words of a notorious Mafia associate to bring charges against him. This unfolding saga, which has drawn widespread attention, hinges on Comey’s social media activity and the political tensions surrounding his previous tenure in the FBI.
Allegations of Unlawful Surveillance
In a series of court documents filed late on Tuesday, Comey’s legal team accused a senior official at the Justice Department of directing the Secret Service to engage in illegal tracking of his mobile phone. This surveillance reportedly occurred after Comey shared a photo on social media in May 2025, featuring seashells arranged to depict the numbers “86 47.” The filings indicate that this monitoring included instances where Comey and his wife were recorded visiting the grave of their late son.
The North Carolina federal court documents further revealed that Secret Service personnel discussed the feasibility of “pinging” Comey’s phone. According to CBS News, a request was made to Verizon to ascertain Comey’s location, described as necessary due to an “emergency.” However, an unidentified official within the Secret Service expressed reservations, stating that they did not believe anyone’s life was in imminent danger and deemed the action legally questionable.
Ties to Mafia Terminology
Comey’s legal troubles have taken a curious turn, with court papers disclosing that an FBI agent consulted with Salvatore “Sammy the Bull” Gravano, a former underboss of the Gambino crime family turned informant. Gravano noted that the term “86,” used in Mafia circles, refers to the act of killing someone. He asserted that, given Comey’s extensive law enforcement background, he must have understood its implications.
However, Gravano also clarified that he did not recall discussing the term with Comey or associating it with any trials during his tenure. This aspect raises questions about the extent to which the prosecution can rely on this Mafia connection as legitimate evidence against Comey.
The Charges and Political Context
Comey, who was dismissed by then-President Donald Trump in 2017, faces two felony charges stemming from his aforementioned social media post, which prosecutors allege constituted a threat against Trump, the current President of the United States. The latest court filings seek to have these charges dismissed, asserting that they are rooted in prosecutorial misconduct driven by Trump’s personal animosity towards Comey.
In one of the filings, Comey’s lawyers stated, “Ample objective evidence — much of which comes directly from government officials’ own public statements and admissions — establishes that the President’s animus toward Mr. Comey led to this vindictive and selective prosecution.” The White House has refrained from commenting, directing inquiries to the Justice Department, which has maintained that Comey will receive a fair trial as any other defendant.
This indictment marks the second legal challenge Comey has faced since Trump’s return to the White House in 2025. The first case, which involved accusations of lying to Congress, was dismissed in November 2025 by a judge who ruled that the interim U.S. attorney who brought the charges was improperly appointed.
Why it Matters
The implications of this case extend far beyond the courtroom, highlighting the contentious nature of American politics and the potential for personal vendettas to influence legal proceedings. As Comey continues to navigate these serious allegations, the broader discourse surrounding the integrity of law enforcement and the judicial system is brought into sharp focus. This situation serves as a stark reminder of the complexities at the intersection of politics and justice, raising critical questions about accountability and the protection of civil liberties in an increasingly polarized environment.