**
The legal saga surrounding E. Jean Carroll and Donald Trump has taken another dramatic turn, with the US Department of Justice reportedly launching a criminal investigation into allegations of perjury against Carroll. This development follows Carroll’s victorious civil suit in which a jury awarded her $5 million after finding that Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and subsequently defamed her in 2022 by denying the accusations.
Investigation Focus
According to unnamed sources cited by CNN, the investigation is examining whether Carroll provided false testimony during her civil lawsuits against Trump. The first lawsuit centred on the alleged sexual assault in a department store dressing room, while the second pertained to defamation arising from Trump’s public denials. Prosecutors appear to be particularly interested in Carroll’s statement during a 2022 deposition, where she claimed she had not received any external funding for her legal battle.
However, this claim came under scrutiny when Carroll’s legal team later informed the court that a nonprofit organisation funded by Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, had contributed to some of her legal expenses. Carroll’s lawyers also asserted that she had no direct contact with those involved in the funding. This prompted Trump’s attorney, Alina Habba, to request a second round of questioning for Carroll, which took place prior to the trial.
Documenting the Fight
The legal proceedings garnered additional attention with the release of the documentary “Ask E Jean,” which features excerpts from Carroll’s videotaped depositions with Habba. The film premiered in New York last week, further solidifying Carroll’s narrative in the public eye.
Despite the jury’s ruling in her favour, Trump has consistently contested the awarded damages, appealing both the $5 million related to the sexual abuse case and an additional $83 million concerning the defamation suit. He has sought to have the jury’s decisions overturned, demonstrating his ongoing resistance to the legal consequences of his actions.
Previous Court Decisions
In a previous ruling, a federal appeals court in New York dismissed claims that Carroll had lied during her deposition, stating that her testimony was credible. The judges noted that Carroll had genuinely forgotten about the limited outside funding when she answered questions in 2022. Their opinion, issued on 30 December 2024, indicated that Carroll had not discussed funding matters with her attorneys for over two years, further supporting the notion that she was not actively involved in the financial aspects of her litigation.
The investigation has been initiated under the direction of Andrew Boutros, the US Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, who was appointed during Trump’s presidency. Notably, Todd Blanche, who previously defended Trump in the Carroll case, has recused himself from the ongoing investigation.
Implications of the Investigation
The unfolding events have not only raised questions about the integrity of Carroll’s testimony but have also highlighted the complexities of legal battles involving high-profile figures. Boutros himself is currently under scrutiny, following claims from a defence attorney suggesting he may have had inappropriate contact with a grand jury in an unrelated case.
Why it Matters
This investigation underscores the fraught intersection of personal and political battles in the realm of corporate America, where the stakes can extend far beyond financial penalties. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, the implications for both Carroll and Trump could shape precedents for future cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct and the veracity of testimony. The outcome may not only affect the individuals involved but also influence public perception and trust in the judicial process.