**
Carlos Garcia, a 39-year-old construction worker in Hamilton, Ontario, is embroiled in a desperate battle to remain in Canada after his application for refugee status was denied by the Immigration and Refugee Board (IRB). Having fled Mexico six years ago due to persistent threats from the notorious Jalisco New Generation Cartel (JNGC), Garcia’s plight highlights the complexities surrounding asylum claims in a nation grappling with an increasing backlog of applications.
A Journey of Fear and Survival
Garcia’s journey began in 2019 when he sought asylum in Canada, claiming that his life was endangered by the JNGC, one of Mexico’s most powerful drug trafficking organisations. His affidavit, filed with the Federal Court, reveals a harrowing history of violence and intimidation. Despite acknowledging the threats Garcia faced, the IRB concluded last September that he could safely relocate within Mexico, specifically to Merida, nearly 2,000 kilometres from his hometown of Guadalajara, where cartel activity is rampant.
This decision has left Garcia in a precarious situation. “I hope the government can understand that it is not safe for me to go back to my home country,” he expressed in a recent interview. As a single father to three children, Garcia fears for their safety should they be forced to return to a nation marked by ongoing cartel violence.
The Cartel’s Reign of Terror
The Jalisco New Generation Cartel has been notorious for its brutal tactics and extensive criminal networks. The cartel’s influence in regions like Guadalajara has been well-documented, particularly following the death of its former leader, Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho,” in February 2023. His death led to an escalation of violence, further complicating the security landscape in the area.
Ottawa officially designated the JNGC as a terrorist organisation in 2025, acknowledging the extreme violence it perpetrates both within Mexico and across international borders. Yet, this recognition has not translated into consistent protection for asylum seekers like Garcia, who find themselves subject to the contentious Internal Flight Alternative (IFA) policy. This approach allows claimants to be deemed safe in other regions of their home countries, despite the pervasive threat posed by criminal organisations.
The Backlog Dilemma
The federal Immigration Ministry and the IRB are currently grappling with an overwhelming backlog of refugee applications, with approximately 300,000 claims pending. The IRB’s decision-making process has been criticised for lacking the necessary thoroughness, as many cases are evaluated without in-person hearings, a method introduced to alleviate the burden on the system.
The IRB, while unable to comment on specific cases, maintains that each refugee claim is assessed on its own merits, based on the evidence presented. However, for individuals like Garcia, the outcome can feel arbitrary and disconnected from the realities they face.
A Community Rallying for Justice
Garcia has found support in his employer, Doug Dolson, the CEO of Paramount Landscaping Inc. Dolson has publicly appealed to the government on Garcia’s behalf, emphasising Canada’s commitment to protecting those fleeing violence and persecution. “As an employer of over 200 people across Canada and a significant taxpayer contributing heavily to this country’s economy, I find it unacceptable to see hard-working individuals like Carlos face deportation,” Dolson stated in a heartfelt letter to immigration authorities.
As Garcia awaits a judicial review of his case, the uncertainty looms large, creating an environment of stress for him and his children. “They are facing the prospect that they will have to uproot and go back to a part of Mexico they have never even been to. We want Canada to remain our home,” he lamented.
Why it Matters
Garcia’s struggle is emblematic of the broader challenges facing refugees in Canada, particularly those fleeing organised crime and violence. His case underscores the urgent need for a more compassionate and thorough approach to refugee assessments, ensuring that those seeking safety are given the protection they deserve. As Canada continues to navigate its role as a haven for the vulnerable, the decisions made in cases like Garcia’s will have lasting implications for the nation’s identity and commitment to human rights.