**
New evidence from a public inquiry into British military operations in Afghanistan has highlighted serious concerns regarding the conduct of British special forces, particularly the SAS, during their deployment in Helmand province. The inquiry reveals that up to 80 civilian deaths occurred in operations, leading to significant tension between British forces and the Afghan government, particularly under President Hamid Karzai, who voiced strong objections to the tactics employed by British troops.
Civilian Casualties Prompt Diplomatic Tensions
The inquiry’s newly released findings detail how the high number of Afghan civilian casualties led to a notable complaint from President Karzai to NATO commanders. Described as “muscular,” Karzai’s response illustrates the deepening frustration within the Afghan leadership regarding British operations. Evidence presented by a staff officer, referred to as N1788, indicates that by 2011, Afghan military units were increasingly unwilling to collaborate with British special forces, signalling a significant breakdown in trust.
The inquiry further revealed that the reluctance of Afghan forces to cooperate with British troops became a critical issue, hampering NATO’s overall strategy in the region. This development coincided with escalating violence from the Taliban and a surge of US troops in Afghanistan, as President Barack Obama sought to counteract the growing insurgency. The summary of N1788’s testimony underscores the urgency of addressing these operational challenges, stating, “It was a known issue and a big deal.”
Questionable Tactics Under Scrutiny
A key aspect of the inquiry involves a specific operational procedure where Afghan men were instructed to return inside their family compounds during night-time raids. On multiple occasions, these individuals were reported to have presented weapons, resulting in their deaths. N1788 described this practice as having evolved into an “inefficient” tactic, with instances where the number of Afghan men killed surpassed the number of weapons recovered. This contradiction raised alarms about the effectiveness and safety of such operations.
Chair of the inquiry, Charles Haddon-Cave, probed into the implications of these tactics, leading N1788 to express concerns that strategies aimed at reducing threats had paradoxically escalated violence. “It was undermining the very reason it was designed for… which was to de-escalate,” he remarked, revealing the complexities and unintended consequences of military operations.
Pressure and Consequences for British Forces
Another witness, identified as N2252, who served as chief of staff to the director of the UK’s special forces during critical years, shed light on the intense pressure faced by British troops. With over 100 soldiers lost in 2010 alone, there was an urgent desire to conduct operations effectively and safely. However, N2252 acknowledged that the tactics employed led to “unintended consequences” that increasingly complicated the situation on the ground.
These revelations align with longstanding concerns regarding the lethal conduct of the SAS in Helmand province, prompting the establishment of the public inquiry in December 2022. Although initial hearings commenced in October 2023, the process has been slow, with many sessions held privately to protect sensitive information regarding the SAS’s operational methodologies.
Allegations of Extreme Measures
During the inquiry, alarming allegations surfaced about the conduct of British special forces, including claims that two Afghan adults were shot while sleeping next to children. Additionally, testimony from a British soldier suggested that there may have been an informal policy within the SAS to eliminate all males on target, regardless of the threat they posed, a practice colloquially dubbed “flat packing.”
These serious allegations and the evidence presented highlight the dire consequences of military operations on civilian populations and the ethical dilemmas faced by soldiers in combat zones.
Why it Matters
The ongoing inquiry into British military operations in Afghanistan raises profound questions about the rules of engagement and the protection of civilian lives in conflict zones. As evidence of civilian casualties mounts, it underscores the critical need for accountability and transparency in military operations. The findings not only reflect on past actions but also serve as a cautionary tale for future military engagements, emphasising the importance of safeguarding human rights and ensuring the safety of non-combatants in war-torn regions.
