**
In a disturbing exposé, a recent investigation reveals the deep-seated culture of intimidation and coercion within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) during the Trump administration. As the agency underwent significant restructuring under former Secretary Kristi Noem, employees reported an environment rife with fear, forced reassignments, and unethical practices that have left lasting scars on both staff and vulnerable immigrant populations.
A Climate of Intimidation
Throughout the final months of Kristi Noem’s leadership, federal officials involved in the administration’s controversial mass deportation agenda experienced unprecedented levels of intimidation. An investigation conducted over several months uncovered testimonies from over three dozen current and former DHS employees. Many described a regime of fear orchestrated by Trump loyalists in high-ranking positions, who systematically sidelined career officials raising legal or ethical concerns. Reports of threats of termination and arrest were common, with some staff members subjected to intimidating polygraph tests administered by military personnel.
Harun Ahmed, a former deputy chief in the refugee affairs law division at USCIS, articulated his disillusionment after nearly 17 years of public service. “I wanted to work with refugees,” he lamented, reflecting on the pressures to endorse policies that contradicted the mission of protecting asylum seekers. Following Trump’s return to power, career officials faced mounting pressure to comply with directives that many deemed immoral or illegal.
Systematic Dismantling of Oversight
The past year and a half has seen the deliberate dismantling of crucial offices and oversight bodies within the DHS. Significant divisions, including those responsible for refugee policy and family unity, were particularly hard hit. Under Noem’s leadership, more than 675,000 deportations were executed, while the administration effectively halted refugee resettlement, instead prioritising the fast-tracking of admissions for specific demographics. Reports indicate a return to family separation policies and the use of controversial detention practices, including the repurposing of Guantánamo Bay for immigration detention.
Ahmed recounted the internal objections raised by career staff against these changes, particularly regarding the escalation of enforcement measures. Despite these concerns, dissenters found themselves sidelined, blacklisted, or removed from critical projects. Faced with an untenable working environment, Ahmed ultimately accepted a buyout from the government, a decision he made reluctantly.
Coercive Tactics: Polygraphs and Reassignments
The use of polygraph examinations emerged as a particularly egregious tactic employed to intimidate employees. Several current and former DHS officials reported undergoing these tests, which were not routine but rather a tool for instilling fear. Witnesses described being subjected to lengthy sessions that often lasted up to six hours, during which they were monitored closely and warned against altering their breathing. Many felt that the entire process was designed to create a hostile environment where compliance was the only option.
Forced reassignments compounded the atmosphere of anxiety. Employees were often ordered to relocate to different offices—sometimes across the country—into roles ill-suited to their expertise, leaving them with little choice but to comply or resign. Current officials highlighted that these measures were not merely managerial decisions but strategic pressures to force loyalty and compliance from career staff.
The Impact of Leadership Changes
Kristi Noem’s tenure came to an end in March 2026, following a backlash over the actions of federal immigration agents and mounting scrutiny of her administration’s practices. Markwayne Mullin, a staunch supporter of Trump, was subsequently confirmed as the new DHS secretary. While Mullin has promised a more stable approach than his predecessor, many inside the department caution that the underlying issues remain unchanged. They assert that the White House continues to exert significant control over immigration policy, with figures like Stephen Miller still holding considerable influence.
The office responsible for civil rights oversight within the DHS has been severely weakened, with more than 100 staff members dismissed under Noem’s leadership. This has left numerous investigations frozen, exacerbating the vulnerability of those the agency is meant to protect. As a result, advocates for immigrants and refugees express grave concern over the implications for human rights and the ethical obligations of the government.
Why it Matters
The revelations from within the DHS are not merely administrative failings but a profound violation of ethical governance and human rights. The culture of fear and intimidation has far-reaching consequences, not only for the agency’s staff but also for the vulnerable populations relying on its protections. As the Biden administration continues to navigate the complexities of immigration reform, the legacy of these policies and practices will resonate, highlighting the urgent need for a re-evaluation of priorities within the DHS. The treatment of both employees and immigrants underscores a critical juncture for the future of American immigration policy and humanitarian responsibilities.
