**
Iranian authorities have announced that they have received a response from the United States regarding their latest peace proposal, a development that may hold significant implications for the ongoing tensions between the two nations. The Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson confirmed that the response was communicated through Pakistan and is currently under review. While the US has not yet officially acknowledged its reply, President Donald Trump indicated to Israeli media that the proposal does not meet his approval.
Details of Iran’s Peace Proposal
The Iranian peace initiative, which consists of 14 key points, calls for a comprehensive withdrawal of US forces from areas adjacent to Iran’s borders and demands an end to the naval blockade affecting Iranian ports. Moreover, it stipulates that hostilities must cease altogether, including military operations conducted by Israel in Lebanon. Tehran has requested that both sides aim to formalise an agreement within a month, emphasising the importance of focusing on “ending the war” rather than merely extending the existing ceasefire.
Esmaeil Baghaei, spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry, remarked that, at this juncture, discussions concerning nuclear negotiations are not on the table—an issue that remains central to Washington’s agenda. Iran has consistently maintained that its nuclear programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes, despite being the only non-nuclear-armed country enriching uranium close to weapons-grade levels.
Trump’s Response and Potential Military Actions
In a social media post, President Trump confirmed that the US had received the Iranian proposal and expressed scepticism about its viability. He stated, “I can’t imagine that it would be acceptable,” citing what he views as a lack of accountability for Iran’s actions over the past several decades. During a press conference in Palm Beach, Florida, he clarified that he is still in the process of reviewing the proposal, having been briefed on its general concept but awaiting the specific language.
Moreover, Trump did not rule out the possibility of renewing military actions against Iranian targets, conditioning such decisions on Iran’s future behaviour. “If they misbehave… we will see,” he noted, indicating a reluctance to withdraw US forces entirely from the conflict.
This stance comes as the Iranian government has severely restricted maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial global oil passage, in response to military actions taken by the US and its allies. The US has enforced a blockade on Iranian ports as part of its broader strategy in the region.
Congressional Concerns and Political Dynamics
In recent days, Trump has communicated with Congress regarding the ongoing military engagement, asserting that the conflict has been effectively “terminated” since a ceasefire was established on 8 April. By his interpretation, this allows him to bypass the usual requirement for congressional approval of military actions within a 60-day timeframe.
With the 60-day limit having been reached since his initial notification to Congress about strikes against Iran on 2 March, some Republican lawmakers are expressing frustration over the lack of clear objectives and the complexity of the situation. Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri has urged the administration to consider redeploying forces, while Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski voiced concerns about the potential risks of a hasty withdrawal, advocating for a balanced approach to ensure that Iran’s capabilities are not left intact.
Why it Matters
The unfolding events surrounding Iran’s peace proposal and the US response underscore the precarious nature of international relations in the region. As both nations navigate a complex web of interests and hostilities, the potential for military escalation remains a pressing concern. The dynamics within the US Congress further complicate the administration’s strategy, revealing a growing bipartisan apprehension regarding prolonged military engagements that lack clear objectives. The outcome of this diplomatic exchange could not only reshape US-Iran relations but also influence the stability of the broader Middle East, highlighting the urgent need for a sustainable resolution to ongoing conflicts.
