**
In a significant development, leaders from Israel and Lebanon have consented to a ceasefire lasting ten days, commencing from 17:00 EST (21:00 GMT; midnight local time) on Thursday. This agreement, announced by US President Donald Trump, comes after six weeks of intense conflict involving Israel and Hezbollah, the Iranian-backed militant group, particularly in southern Lebanon.
Ceasefire Agreement Details
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu confirmed Israel’s commitment to the truce while insisting that Israeli troops would maintain a security presence, specifically a 10-kilometre (6.2 miles) deep zone in southern Lebanon. Netanyahu stated: “We are there, and we are not leaving.” Hezbollah has indicated a willingness to participate in the ceasefire; however, it demands a comprehensive cessation of attacks throughout Lebanon and restrictions on Israeli military movements.
The ceasefire announcement was welcomed by Iran, with its foreign ministry asserting that a two-week truce it had sought with the US should encompass Lebanon as well. Meanwhile, discussions between US and Iranian officials are reportedly underway for a second round of peace talks in Pakistan. Trump confirmed that there had been substantial agreements between the US and Iran, including a stipulation that Tehran would refrain from developing nuclear weapons “beyond 20 years.” However, he cautioned that failure to secure an agreement could lead to a resumption of hostilities.
Background of the Conflict
The current hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah erupted on 2 March, shortly after a joint US-Israeli strike against Iran. The conflict escalated when Hezbollah retaliated by launching rockets into northern Israel, claiming it was responding to the assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Since the onset of this conflict, over 2,000 people in Lebanon have lost their lives, with more than one million displaced—approximately one-fifth of the country’s population. Additionally, an estimated 37,000 homes have been either destroyed or damaged. Israeli reports indicate that Hezbollah’s actions have resulted in two civilian fatalities in Israel and the deaths of 13 Israeli soldiers during confrontations in Lebanon.
This week witnessed rare direct negotiations between Israeli and Lebanese officials in Washington, aimed at de-escalating the conflict, which has seen devastating airstrikes in Beirut. Notably, Israel has clarified that it is not in conflict with the Lebanese armed forces.
Future Implications of the Ceasefire
In light of the ceasefire announcement, Trump expressed optimism about the potential for a historic agreement between Israel and Lebanon, the first of its kind since the Lebanese Civil War in 1983. He stated he would invite Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun to the White House for discussions in the coming weeks.
Details released by the US State Department reveal that the ceasefire may be extended if both parties agree, and Israel retains the right to take necessary self-defensive actions against any imminent threats. The ceasefire’s initiation was marred by continued cross-border strikes, raising concerns about its effectiveness.
Challenges Ahead
As the ceasefire period unfolds, the unresolved issue of Hezbollah’s arsenal remains a significant concern. Lebanese authorities have long maintained that disarming Hezbollah cannot be achieved through force and necessitates negotiation with the group. Historically, ceasefires have not translated into lasting peace, as evidenced by previous agreements that still saw consistent cross-border clashes.
Netanyahu has termed the ceasefire a pivotal opportunity for a historic peace agreement, yet he reiterated that Israeli forces must remain in southern Lebanon to prevent potential threats.
Why it Matters
The ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon represents a crucial moment in a protracted conflict that has already resulted in extensive loss of life and humanitarian crises. As the world watches closely, the effectiveness of this truce will hinge on the commitment of both sides to negotiate in good faith. The outcome could not only reshape regional dynamics but also influence broader geopolitical relations, particularly involving Iran and its allies in the region.