Tensions within the Labour Party have escalated following Wes Streeting’s provocative suggestion that the UK should consider rejoining the European Union. This statement has sparked criticism from within the party, particularly from allies of Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor, who fear that the debate could reignite divisions over Brexit just as the party prepares for a crucial by-election in Makerfield.
Streeting’s Controversial Proposition
Wes Streeting, a prominent figure in Labour’s potential leadership race, has labelled Brexit a “catastrophic mistake” and advocated for a renewed relationship with the EU, even suggesting that the ultimate goal should be rejoining the bloc. His comments have drawn sharp rebukes from other party members, including Lisa Nandy, who described Streeting’s remarks as “odd.” Nandy, a cabinet minister and supporter of Burnham, highlighted the risks of reopening the Brexit debate at a time when the party should be focused on winning elections.
Streeting’s call has come at a particularly sensitive time, as Labour is gearing up for the Makerfield by-election, a constituency that voted Leave in the 2016 referendum. Critics argue that such statements could alienate voters who are still supportive of Brexit, potentially bolstering the Reform Party’s standing in upcoming elections.
The Fallout: Burnham’s Position Under Scrutiny
The fallout from Streeting’s comments has placed Burnham in an uncomfortable position. While he has previously expressed a desire for the UK to rejoin the EU, he is now facing pressure to moderate his stance to appeal to Makerfield constituents. When questioned about his views in light of the by-election, Burnham stated he would not advocate for rejoining the EU at this time, suggesting a more cautious approach to the issue.
Supporters of Burnham, including his ally Josh Simon, maintain that his election to Parliament is crucial for Labour’s chances against Reform. According to Simon, a loss could lead to an “existential” crisis for the party, significantly undermining Burnham’s aspirations to challenge Sir Keir Starmer for the leadership.
Internal Divisions and Leadership Challenges
The divisions within Labour are further complicated by Nandy’s comments regarding Starmer’s leadership. She suggested that it is a “personal decision” for Starmer to determine whether he wishes to fight to retain his position as leader, signalling a growing sense of uncertainty about his future. Former minister Jess Phillips echoed this sentiment, arguing that Starmer should not cling to leadership if internal challenges arise.
Meanwhile, figures such as Nigel Farage have seized the opportunity to criticise Burnham, labelling him “open borders Burnham” and asserting that he must be stopped. The Tory leader, Kemi Badenoch, has also weighed in, accusing Labour of recycling the Brexit debate due to a lack of substantive plans for the country.
The Broader Implications
As the Labour Party grapples with its identity and direction, Nandy has expressed frustration over what she sees as an insular focus on internal leadership contests rather than addressing the pressing concerns of the electorate. She remarked that the public is not preoccupied with who leads the party but rather with the fundamental changes they seek in their lives.

The ongoing discourse around Brexit and leadership within Labour reflects a larger struggle within the party to remain relevant and responsive to the needs of its constituents. As the political landscape shifts, the ability of Labour to navigate these internal conflicts will be crucial for its future viability.
Why it Matters
The current turmoil within the Labour Party is emblematic of broader challenges facing political parties in the UK as they navigate post-Brexit realities. The debate over rejoining the EU not only highlights divisions within Labour but also raises critical questions about the party’s ability to unify and connect with voters. As the political climate continues to evolve, the outcome of the Makerfield by-election and the subsequent leadership dynamics may significantly influence Labour’s trajectory and its relevance in British politics moving forward.