Acclaimed author Maggie O’Farrell, known for her bestselling novel “Hamnet,” has made headlines with her recent decision to decline an OBE (Order of the British Empire). In a candid interview, O’Farrell articulated her reasons for rejecting the honour, which she felt conflicted with her values and heritage.
A Stand Against Colonial Legacy
The 54-year-old writer, born in Ireland and raised in Wales and Scotland, expressed her discomfort with having the term “British Empire” associated with her name. In a conversation with *The Irish Times*, O’Farrell stated, “I was thinking about why it was I didn’t want it, and the first thing was that I didn’t want ‘British Empire’ as part of my name.” This sentiment reflects a growing awareness and sensitivity towards the colonial past that continues to resonate in contemporary discussions about identity and recognition.
In addition to her concerns about the title itself, O’Farrell highlighted her objection to the honours system’s historical context. She specifically mentioned the knighthood awarded to Charles Trevelyan, a Victorian administrator notorious for his role in the Irish Famine, noting, “If [Trevelyan] has it, I don’t want it.” This powerful statement underscores her commitment to rejecting a system that, in her view, rewards figures with a legacy of oppression.
The Influence of Irish Heritage
O’Farrell’s forthcoming novel, *Land*, which transports readers to 1865 Ireland, further explores themes of identity and legacy. She revealed that her decision to turn down the OBE was one of the “seeds” that inspired her latest work. The book follows a father and son involved in the Great Ordnance Survey project, mapping Ireland—a subject deeply intertwined with her Irish roots and personal narrative.
By addressing her heritage and the impact of colonialism, O’Farrell is not only contributing to the literary canon but also engaging in critical conversations about the meanings of honour and recognition in modern society. Her stance resonates with a larger movement among artists and public figures who are increasingly scrutinising their associations with historical honours.
A Growing Trend Among Artists
O’Farrell is not alone in her decision to reject British honours. A number of notable figures, including writers Roald Dahl and Benjamin Zephaniah, as well as chef Nigella Lawson, have similarly declined accolades for various reasons. In 2020, actor Michael Sheen returned his award upon realising that his anti-imperialist beliefs were incompatible with being recognised by the honours system.
This wave of rejections signals a shift in how public figures are perceiving the implications of such titles, especially in light of historical injustices. O’Farrell’s choice adds to this discourse, prompting a reevaluation of what it means to accept recognition within a system tied to a complex and often painful history.
Why it Matters
Maggie O’Farrell’s decision to turn down an OBE is significant not just for her personal convictions but also for the broader conversation about how we honour historical legacies. As society grapples with the complexities of colonialism, identity, and recognition, her stance encourages others to reflect on the implications of accepting honours that may carry historical baggage. In an era where many are demanding accountability and change, O’Farrell’s rejection serves as a reminder that individual choices can resonate far beyond personal sentiment, influencing cultural narratives and inspiring a collective rethinking of how we honour the past.
