In a revealing account, Marina Wheeler, the former wife of Boris Johnson, has suggested that her changing views on the European Union may have played a significant role in shaping her ex-husband’s decision to champion the Brexit campaign. In her contribution to Sir Anthony Seldon’s book *The Brexit Effect*, Wheeler reflects on her transformation from a staunch EU advocate to someone who felt compelled to advocate for Britain to regain control over its laws. This personal evolution, she asserts, likely resonated with Johnson as he navigated his own complex relationship with the EU.
A Change of Heart
Wheeler, a prominent human rights lawyer, reveals that during their 27-year marriage, she was a dedicated supporter of the EU. However, her perspective shifted dramatically as she became increasingly concerned about the influence of European judges over UK legislation. This revelation, she states, was pivotal in her decision to reassess her long-held beliefs about the EU. “The status quo was no longer acceptable,” she remarked, indicating that this shift was not just personal but reflective of a broader sentiment within the UK.
Her transformation occurred in the lead-up to the 2016 referendum, a time when public opinion was beginning to sour on the EU. Wheeler believes that her newfound scepticism may have provided a bellwether for Johnson, who was contemplating his own stance on Brexit. “It undoubtedly struck him,” she noted, adding that her disillusionment might have encouraged him to perceive the growing discontent among the electorate.
Johnson’s Uncertainty Ahead of the Vote
Interestingly, Wheeler’s insights come after revelations that Johnson himself was ambivalent about Brexit right up until the referendum. Reports surfaced that he had penned two separate articles—one advocating for Brexit and the other against it—demonstrating his internal conflict. This hesitation underscores the complexities of his decision-making process in the months leading to the historic vote.
Reflecting on their relationship, Wheeler recounts how she and Johnson first crossed paths at the European School in Brussels. They married in 1993 but ultimately divorced in 2020. Despite their personal separation, Wheeler maintains that the aftermath of Brexit has been a source of societal tension. Yet, she insists that the decision to leave the EU was ultimately the right one, even as the divisions it has created continue to be a source of frustration.
The Need for New Approaches
Wheeler emphasises the necessity for “strong close relations” between the UK and Europe moving forward. However, she warns against the notion of rejoining the EU. “Talk of rejoining is not a fruitful way to move forward,” she argued, pointing out that many perceived EU actions as infringements on British sovereignty. She advocates for a more pragmatic approach, one that acknowledges the need for both the UK and the EU to adapt in a post-Brexit landscape.
She also calls out Brussels for its punitive measures against the UK since the departure. According to Wheeler, the EU must stop treating the UK as a pariah for choosing to leave. “Punishing the UK for leaving does not serve anyone’s interests,” she stated firmly.
Why it Matters
Wheeler’s reflections on her changing views not only provide insight into her personal journey but also highlight the broader dynamics at play in the UK’s relationship with the EU. As the country grapples with the consequences of Brexit, understanding these nuanced perspectives is crucial for fostering dialogue and rebuilding connections with Europe. With ongoing debates about the future of UK-EU relations, Wheeler’s comments serve as a reminder of the need for a cooperative approach that prioritises mutual interests over outdated grievances.
