**
A significant demonstration in central London resulted in over 500 arrests as protesters rallied against the ban on Palestine Action, according to the Metropolitan Police. The protest, held in Trafalgar Square, saw a diverse crowd expressing their opposition to the government’s restrictions on the group, which was declared unlawful under anti-terror legislation in July 2025. Demonstrators ranged in age from 18 to 87, with many brandishing placards that echoed sentiments of solidarity with Palestine.
A Show of Solidarity
The protest, dubbed “Everyone Day,” was organised by Defend Our Juries, aimed at showcasing the ongoing resistance to the prohibition of Palestine Action. Attendees carried signs proclaiming, “I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action,” a recurring message seen in previous demonstrations. Many participants expressed their commitment to the right to protest, while others voiced their opposition to US and Israeli policies regarding the conflict in Gaza.
The ban on Palestine Action was initially implemented in July 2025, prohibiting support for the group under the Terrorism Act. Although a High Court ruling in February deemed the ban unlawful, it remained in effect pending an appeal. In March, the Metropolitan Police announced they would resume arrests for those demonstrating support for Palestine Action, contradicting earlier indications that arrests would be less likely following the court’s decision.
Police Warnings and Arrests
Before the protest began, the Metropolitan Police issued a stern warning about potential criminal charges for those attending. Commander Claire Smart, who oversaw policing operations that weekend, stated, “Those attending should be aware that showing support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act, and we will not hesitate to act where the law is broken.” Despite these warnings, many protesters expressed their willingness to accept the risk of arrest, underscoring their determination to stand for their beliefs.
Among those detained was Robert Del Naja, co-founder of the influential band Massive Attack. Del Naja expressed his views on the police’s decision to resume arrests, calling it “ridiculous.” He articulated his belief that the actions of Palestine Action were patriotic, as they aimed to prevent involvement in what he described as serious war crimes. Del Naja’s remarks reflect a wider sentiment among many demonstrators who view their actions as a moral imperative.
Voices of Protest
Other attendees shared their reasons for participating, with one protester, Linda Walker, stating she felt compelled to act against what she described as “genocide” occurring over the last two-and-a-half years. Walker lamented that the government seemed more inclined to target those opposing such violence than to confront the issue itself. This perspective aligns with a broader narrative among critics of the Israeli government’s military actions in Gaza, which they assert constitute violations of human rights.
The police reported that by 16:50 BST, 212 arrests had already been made, and this number rose to 523 by 23:07 BST. The Metropolitan Police expressed gratitude for the professionalism of their officers during the event, which has drawn significant public and media attention.
The Broader Context
Since the ban on Palestine Action was enacted, over 2,200 individuals have reportedly been arrested for showing support for the group. The legal proceedings against many of those detained have been postponed as the battle over the legitimacy of the ban continues. The implications of this legal struggle extend beyond the immediate protests, as it raises critical questions about free speech, the right to protest, and the government’s role in regulating dissent.
Why it Matters
The events of this weekend reflect a growing tension in the UK surrounding issues of free expression and governmental authority. As more individuals find themselves at odds with state-imposed restrictions, the implications for civil liberties are profound. This demonstration serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of public discourse in shaping policy and the need for ongoing scrutiny of governmental actions in the face of rising civil unrest.
