In a remarkable intersection of faith and technology, Pope Leo XIV recently addressed the pressing concerns surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) during a significant ceremony at the Vatican. The pontiff’s encyclical, which marks the first major written teaching of his papacy, spotlighted the ethical dilemmas posed by AI, including job displacement, environmental damage, and the potential for warfare. Adding a curious twist to the event, he was joined by Chris Olah, co-founder of the AI powerhouse Anthropic, raising questions about the implications of such a partnership.
The Pope’s Warning on AI
Pope Leo XIV’s encyclical delves into the heart of AI’s most troubling ramifications. He articulates a clear concern for the dignity of human work, which he believes is under threat from the rapid advancement of AI technologies. The pontiff specifically highlighted how AI systems could replace jobs, exacerbate conflict, and harm the environment, presenting a clarion call for a more responsible approach to technology.
“The dignity of work must be preserved,” he stated, urging the tech industry to reflect deeply on its impact. Pete Furlong, senior manager of policy and research at the Center for Humane Technology, echoed the pope’s sentiments, cautioning that companies like Anthropic seem to be prioritising innovation over the very human values the pope champions. “You can’t have dignity in a world where you’re building technology to replace people,” he asserted.
Anthropic’s Role in the AI Landscape
As a key player in the AI industry, Anthropic’s involvement at such a high-profile event raises significant ethical questions. Despite the church’s warning, Anthropic has been at the forefront of AI development, with its own research indicating that around 20% of American workers feel their jobs are being impacted by AI. Dario Amodei, Anthropic’s CEO, has previously warned of an impending crisis in white-collar employment due to automation.

The presence of Olah at the Vatican has led to criticisms of “Vatican-washing,” suggesting that the collaboration may merely be a superficial branding exercise rather than a genuine commitment to addressing the ethical concerns raised by the pope. Paolo Carozza, a law professor at Notre Dame, pointedly remarked that while there is value in dialogue, it is crucial to ensure that such discussions lead to meaningful actions rather than just feel-good narratives.
Aligning on AI Ethics and Environmental Concerns
Despite the tensions, there are areas of agreement between Pope Leo XIV and Anthropic. Both parties have expressed concern about the use of AI in warfare, with the pope calling for “the most rigorous ethical constraints” to uphold the sanctity of life. This echoes Anthropic’s own stance against the militarisation of AI technologies, as evidenced by Amodei’s refusal to allow the company’s models to be used in autonomous weapons.
Furthermore, the encyclical touches upon the environmental impact of data centres, which are essential to AI operations. The pope urged for a reduction in the carbon footprint associated with AI technologies. While Anthropic has committed to investing heavily in AI infrastructure, including data centres, it faces the challenge of reconciling its growth ambitions with the urgent need for sustainable practices.
The Road Ahead for AI and the Church
The collaboration between the Vatican and Anthropic signifies a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation about the future of AI. As both parties navigate their respective missions, the potential for meaningful dialogue exists, but so does the risk of superficial engagement. There is a pressing need for both technological innovators and ethical leaders to ensure that AI development aligns with a vision that prioritises human dignity and environmental sustainability.

Why it Matters
This alliance between Pope Leo XIV and Anthropic could reshape the narrative around AI, urging the tech industry to take moral responsibility for its innovations. As AI continues to evolve, the implications for society at large are profound. The partnership serves as a reminder that technology must not only advance but do so in a way that respects and enhances human life. The world is watching closely as these discussions unfold, hoping for a future where innovation and ethics go hand in hand.