**
In a significant shift in policy, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) faces potential restructuring that could diminish its ability to respond effectively to natural disasters. This development comes in the wake of Hurricane Helene’s devastation in 2024, which highlighted the agency’s critical role during emergencies. Experts warn that the proposed changes, championed by a council appointed by former President Trump, may leave the agency ill-equipped to handle the increasing frequency and severity of climate-related crises.
FEMA’s Proposed Transformation
The recommendations laid out by the FEMA Review Council signal a dramatic pivot in how disaster management will be approached in the United States. The 12-member panel, co-led by Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin and Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, advocates for a model that largely shifts responsibility from federal oversight to state and local governments. This approach, they argue, will streamline operations and enhance efficiency within the agency.
In their report, the council emphasised the mantra that “disaster response should be locally executed, state or tribally managed, and federally supported.” However, critics assert that this framework fails to address the escalating demands placed on emergency management systems, particularly as extreme weather events become increasingly common due to climate change.
Local Governments Left to Shoulder the Burden
The proposed reforms include raising the thresholds for disaster declarations that unlock federal assistance, which could leave local governments struggling to manage the aftermath of catastrophic events without sufficient federal support. Kevin Guthrie, a member of the council, indicated that disaster declarations should only be made during events that severely disrupt state and local governance, a sentiment that raises alarms among emergency management professionals.
Dr Andrew Rumbach, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute, noted that many localities lack dedicated emergency management departments and heavily rely on FEMA’s expertise. “This is going to be really a challenging proposition for them,” he stated, reflecting widespread concerns among local officials.
New Funding Models and Reliance on Private Sector
Among the 150 recommendations put forth, the council suggests a significant overhaul of FEMA’s funding structure. A new model would shift federal disaster assistance to a lump-sum payment system, intended to be distributed within 30 days based on projected damages. This change is supposed to expedite recovery but raises questions about its efficacy in addressing the long-term needs of affected communities.
Furthermore, the report advocates for a more prominent role for private entities in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which has been mired in financial difficulties. With the government’s risk assessments increasingly out of date, the reliance on private sector solutions has garnered both interest and criticism.
Climate Change: An Understated Threat
Perhaps the most glaring oversight in the council’s report is the minimal acknowledgment of climate change, with the term mentioned only once throughout the extensive document. This absence highlights a disconnect between the urgent realities of a warming planet and the proposed strategies for managing disaster response. Dr Adam Smith, a former NOAA analyst, pointed out that the first half of 2025 alone saw weather and climate-related damages exceed $101 billion, underscoring the need for a robust and responsive emergency management framework.
Shana Udvardy, a senior climate resilience policy analyst at the Union of Concerned Scientists, expressed her disappointment with the council’s lack of focus on the current climate crisis. “I think it also gives you a sense of the type of people that weren’t at the table,” she remarked, noting the absence of diverse voices from communities most impacted by disasters.
Why it Matters
The proposed restructuring of FEMA represents a pivotal moment in the United States’ approach to disaster management, particularly as climate change intensifies weather-related threats. If the agency is relegated to a supporting role without the necessary federal backing, local governments may find themselves overwhelmed in the face of increasingly severe disasters. As the nation grapples with the realities of a changing climate, the effectiveness of emergency response systems must be prioritised to safeguard vulnerable communities and ensure resilience in the face of future catastrophes.