**
Varun Chandra, a key adviser to Labour leader Keir Starmer, has engaged in a series of undisclosed discussions with prominent executives from leading American technology firms. Conducted over a year, these meetings raise significant concerns about the implications of corporate influence on government policy, particularly in the realms of artificial intelligence and trade negotiations.
Unveiling Chandra’s Secret Meetings
The revelations, unearthed through a Freedom of Information request, show that between October 2024 and October 2025, Chandra held 16 meetings with top figures from tech powerhouses such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple, and Meta. These discussions have been described as central to the government’s strategy for fostering investment from Silicon Valley, which includes substantial energy subsidies and preferential planning for data centres dubbed “AI growth zones.”
Chandra, a political operative with a background in corporate intelligence, has leveraged his connections to advocate for the government’s economic objectives. Appointed shortly after Labour’s 2024 election victory, Chandra’s role as chief business adviser has expanded to encompass that of a trade envoy to the United States, facilitating negotiations aimed at securing AI investments.
The Mechanics of Influence
While political advisers are not bound by the same disclosure requirements as civil servants and ministers, the existence of these meetings has sparked outrage among transparency advocates. Critics argue that this arrangement permits what they term “lobbying behind closed doors,” allowing corporate interests to shape policy without public scrutiny.
Minutes from these clandestine gatherings reveal discussions around regulatory reforms and corporate priorities, including the facilitation of direct meetings between tech executives and the Prime Minister. For example, Chandra reportedly offered to help Oracle’s UK head meet with Starmer, while also paving the way for a conversation between Starmer and Amazon’s newly appointed CEO, Andy Jassy.
Notably, the government is banking on promises from US tech firms to inject £150 billion into the UK economy. However, previous reports suggest that many of these investments may be overstated, presenting existing infrastructure as new projects. This raises questions about the authenticity of the supposed economic boom.
The Regulatory Landscape
Discussions regarding the regulatory environment featured prominently in Chandra’s meetings, particularly with Meta’s vice-president Joel Kaplan. Kaplan, a former Republican operative, provided insights on the UK’s regulatory framework, hinting at a reciprocal relationship that could influence future policy decisions.
Chandra’s meeting with Apple executives coincided with a broader governmental directive to dismantle perceived barriers to business growth. This initiative led to significant changes, including the removal of Competition and Markets Authority chair Marcus Bokkerink, who had been poised to take action against tech monopolies. Following these adjustments, Chancellor Rachel Reeves remarked on the positive feedback from businesses regarding the regulatory landscape.
A Rising Star with Controversial Ties
Chandra’s ascent within the Labour Party reflects his extensive connections and influence. His previous tenure at Hakluyt, a firm known for consulting with major corporations, has granted him an unrivaled network in the business world. Despite stepping into the political arena, he reportedly retains over 300,000 shares in his former company, raising further ethical concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
The Labour leadership has increasingly relied on Chandra’s expertise to bridge the gap between politics and corporate interests. However, this reliance has not come without criticism. His involvement in attempts to privatise Thames Water, while still linked to Hakluyt, exemplifies the potential pitfalls of such close ties with the corporate sector.
Why it Matters
The unfolding narrative around Varun Chandra’s undisclosed meetings with tech giants highlights a troubling trend in contemporary governance—a growing intersection between corporate influence and public policy. As the Labour Party navigates its relationships with powerful business interests, the lack of transparency in such engagements poses a threat to democratic accountability. The ongoing embrace of corporate lobbying risks sidelining the voices of ordinary citizens in favour of a privileged few, setting a concerning precedent for future governance. As calls for a more robust lobbying register intensify, the question remains: who truly holds sway in shaping the policies that govern us?
