**
A noticeable decline in support for Israel among the American public is challenging the long-standing bipartisan consensus surrounding military aid to the nation. As Middle Eastern conflicts intensify and public opinion shifts, both Democratic and Republican lawmakers are feeling the pressure to reevaluate their stance on the US-Israel relationship ahead of the 2028 elections.
A Changing Landscape
Recent polling indicates a significant transformation in how Americans view Israel, with a record 60% expressing unfavourable opinions. This represents a notable increase of 7% in just one year, coinciding with escalating tensions in the region. Key demographic shifts are evident, particularly among younger voters; a majority under the age of 50 across both parties now hold negative views of Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The public’s discontent has intensified following Israel’s military actions in Gaza, which have resulted in substantial casualties, including over 72,000 Palestinians since the conflict reignited on 8 October. The situation has compelled many Democrats, including some who previously supported arms sales to Israel, to reconsider their positions.
Bipartisan Discontent
Senator Bernie Sanders’ repeated attempts to introduce resolutions challenging arms sales to Israel reflect this growing discontent. In a recent vote, 40 Senate Democrats backed his proposal to halt the sale of Caterpillar D9 bulldozers, which critics argue could be used to demolish homes in Palestinian territories. This marks a significant increase in opposition compared to previous efforts.
Jon Hoffman, a foreign-policy analyst at the Cato Institute, notes that Democratic senators eyeing presidential bids in 2028 will likely struggle to gain traction if they do not openly oppose US support for Israel. “We are witnessing a pivotal moment,” Hoffman asserted. “Candidates must align with the shifting sentiments of their constituents or risk being out of touch.”
The Role of Public Opinion
The Pew Research Center’s latest findings illustrate the stark divide in public sentiment, revealing a 20-point rise in unfavourable opinions towards Israel since 2022. This shift in perspective has been exacerbated by the perceived lack of a coherent strategy in the ongoing conflict with Iran, which has drawn the US into a contentious military entanglement.
Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, who supported Sanders’ recent resolutions, emphasised the need for clarity in US foreign policy. “We are not safer with the current trajectory,” he stated, critiquing both the Israeli government’s actions and Trump’s support for military intervention in Iran.
A Fundamental Reassessment
Adding to the narrative of change, the liberal thinktank J Street has taken a historic stance by opposing US funding for arms sales to Israel, including defensive systems like the Iron Dome. Jeremy Ben-Ami, the organisation’s founder, articulated the necessity for Israel to purchase arms without American subsidies, stating that ongoing financial support for the Israeli government’s actions contributes to rising tensions and hostility towards the US.
“This fundamental reassessment,” Ben-Ami noted, “is prompted by the escalating violence in Gaza and the West Bank, as well as the implications of the war with Iran. It’s time for us to stop financing actions that many Americans view as unjust.”
Why it Matters
The landscape of US-Israel relations is undergoing a profound transformation, with implications that extend beyond mere policy. As public opinion reshapes the discourse around military aid, both Democratic and Republican leaders must confront the new reality that support for Israel is no longer a given. The 2028 elections will serve as a critical juncture, determining not only the future of US foreign policy in the Middle East but also the broader implications for America’s role on the global stage. As these dynamics evolve, the very nature of bipartisan support for Israel could be irrevocably altered, reflecting a nation grappling with its values in an increasingly complex geopolitical climate.
