The much-anticipated sequel to the iconic 2006 film *The Devil Wears Prada* has hit theatres, but early reactions suggest it may not live up to its promise of embracing body diversity. As Meryl Streep and Anne Hathaway embarked on a global press tour, they expressed hopes that the film would showcase a broader representation of body types. However, the reality may be more akin to a superficial nod to inclusivity, with a troubling reliance on outdated fat jokes.
Promises of Inclusivity
During interviews leading up to the film’s release, both Streep and Hathaway shared their experiences at Milan Fashion Week, noting the alarming prevalence of extremely thin models. This prompted Hathaway to approach the producers with the desire for a more diverse representation on screen. Streep echoed this sentiment, suggesting that a variety of body types would enhance the viewing experience.
However, just 15 minutes into the film, the first weight-related joke is delivered, signalling that the intentions for genuine representation may have been lost in translation. While there are glimpses of plus-size models, such as Ashley Graham in a catwalk montage, these moments appear more as token gestures rather than a sincere commitment to inclusivity.
A Step Back in Representation
The original *The Devil Wears Prada* emerged during a time when diet culture was at its peak, perpetuating harmful stereotypes about body image. Lines from the film, such as Emily Charlton’s infamous quip about being “one stomach flu away from her goal weight,” have become cultural touchstones for the ways in which women have been encouraged to scrutinise their bodies.
Yet, in recent years, the fashion industry has seen a shift towards body positivity. Landmark moments, such as Graham gracing the cover of *Vogue* as the first plus-size model or Jill Kortleve walking for Chanel, suggested progress. However, a recent report revealed a disheartening regression, with over 97% of looks presented in recent fashion shows modelled by straight-size individuals.
This trend has been compounded by the rise of weight-loss drugs, which have become the latest Hollywood obsession. With many celebrities opting for these medications, the conversation surrounding body image has become increasingly toxic.
The Impact of Outdated Humour
In light of this backdrop, it’s disheartening to see *The Devil Wears Prada 2* resorting to fat jokes for humour. Hathaway’s character, Andy, refers to herself as her “former fat assistant,” echoing the original film’s cruel humour. Despite her growth as an award-winning journalist over the past two decades, the film seems to undermine this progress by continually tying her worth to her appearance.
Miranda Priestly, portrayed by Streep, also contributes to this troubling narrative. At one point, she misunderstands the concept of “body positivity” and dismisses it as “body negative.” Such comments not only reflect a lack of understanding but also perpetuate damaging stereotypes about body image.
Why it Matters
The sequel’s regression in addressing body diversity underscores a broader issue within the entertainment and fashion industries. Rather than fostering an environment of acceptance and celebration of all body types, *The Devil Wears Prada 2* appears to cling to outdated stereotypes that many have fought hard to dismantle. As society grapples with body image issues, the film serves as a reminder of how crucial it is to move beyond superficial representations and genuinely embrace diversity in all its forms. The conversation surrounding body image is more vital than ever, and films like this need to reflect a commitment to positive change rather than perpetuating stereotypes that have long been damaging.